Hey Roelof,
> When I do apt-get dist-upgrade I see this happen:
>
> cannot copy extracted data for
> './lib/modules/3.12-1-amd64/kernel/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip6.ko' to
> '/lib/modules/3.12-1-amd64/kernel/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip6.ko.dpkg-new':
> I see a no space left on device. Which is wierd because I did a
When I do apt-get dist-upgrade I see this happen:
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove it.
The following packages will be upgraded:
linux-image-3.12-1-amd64
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
49 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/29.6 MB of archives.
After
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 22:16, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > (re-arranged a little)
> >
> > Alastair, did you miss the "dselect just stop (I have to C-c to
> > get out)" part of Arnaud's message? Because you can't just hang an
> > installation run becaus
At Sun, 8 Dec 2002 13:28:37 +0100,
Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 11:29:37PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > Oops. Yes, I did. I don't understand why it should hang; I'll log it as
> > a bug and investigate. Might it be due to what you installed next? (I
> > can't reproduce it
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 11:29:37PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Oops. Yes, I did. I don't understand why it should hang; I'll log it as
> a bug and investigate. Might it be due to what you installed next? (I
> can't reproduce it yet; any further info would help).
Something similar happens to
On Friday 06 December 2002 12:52, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
> No default for console-data/keymap/qwertz/swiss/variant - picking one
>
> If you have information about what choice should be the default for
> the above questions which gave warnings, please mail it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for
Oops. Yes, I did. I don't understand why it should hang; I'll log it as
a bug and investigate. Might it be due to what you installed next? (I
can't reproduce it yet; any further info would help).
Regards,
Alastair
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 22:16, Steve Greenland wrote:
> (re-arranged a little)
> > O
(re-arranged a little)
> On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 11:52, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > I just point my apt source list to test unstable and console-data does
> > not like it!... Here is the message and dselect just stop (I have to
> > C-c to get out):
> >
On 06-Dec-02, 12:57 (CST), Alastair McKinstry <[
No, its a sign that the console-data maintainer (me) doesn't know what
is the best keymap for each of the given (human) languages/keymaps, and
needs help!
If you have one of these systems, your opinion would be invaluable.
{ I want to make this go away before Sarge is released).
Regards,
Alastair
I just point my apt source list to test unstable and console-data does
not like it!... Here is the message and dselect just stop (I have to
C-c to get out):
Preconfiguring packages ...
No default for console-data/keymap/qwerty/brazilian/standard/keymap - picking
one
No default for console-data/ke
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 11:18:49AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> One thing, though. After Branden's NMU of wdm 1.20-11.2,
> /etc/X11/wdm/Xservers has all X server lines commented out. It used to
> be that the postinst would uncomment one if the user requested it that
> wdm be used to manage :0.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 06:16:37PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> Perhaps the packages could do something about it. This is certainly
> FAQ material.
Yeah, hence the fact that my message to Dale quoted from my own FAQ,
available in xfree86-common.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Con
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:28:39AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> Now I seem to have some font problems. Netscape seems to be OK, but the
> GIMP comes up with [] [] [] [] [] in place of the hint text. The title
> bars are OK but any "filled in" text is just [] repeated. Any hints?
Branden gives a
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 11:41:47AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 04:35:51PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
> > > Since the debconf default-display-manager mechanism is now used to
> > > determine which display manager runs, shouldn't wdm/Xservers contain a
> > > valid server lin
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 04:35:51PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
> > Since the debconf default-display-manager mechanism is now used to
> > determine which display manager runs, shouldn't wdm/Xservers contain a
> > valid server line for :0?
>
> Just uncommented the last line in /etc/X11/wdm/Xservers,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 11:18:49AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:40:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:28:39AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > > On the installation in question the Xservers file has everything commented
> > > out. The defau
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:40:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:28:39AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > On the installation in question the Xservers file has everything commented
> > out. The default-display-manager file contains the line:
> >
> > /usr/bin/X11/wdm
> >
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:28:39AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > Now I seem to have some font problems. Netscape seems to be OK, but the
> > GIMP comes up with [] [] [] [] [] in place of the hint text. The title
> > bars are OK but any "filled in" text i
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:28:39AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On the installation in question the Xservers file has everything commented
> out. The default-display-manager file contains the line:
>
> /usr/bin/X11/wdm
>
> I put the correct line into the Xservers file and wdm comes up as
> expect
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:28:39AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> Now I seem to have some font problems. Netscape seems to be OK, but the
> GIMP comes up with [] [] [] [] [] in place of the hint text. The title
> bars are OK but any "filled in" text is just [] repeated. Any hints?
Some have reported
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:08:15AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 11:53:38AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > > I copied XF86Config from my old Woody system into the newly upgraded
> > > system and, while startx works just fin
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 11:53:38AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > I copied XF86Config from my old Woody system into the newly upgraded
> > system and, while startx works just fine, wdm starts up but doesn't start
> > the server, or log any messages i
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 11:53:38AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > I copied XF86Config from my old Woody system into the newly upgraded
> > system and, while startx works just fine, wdm starts up but doesn't start
> > the server, or log any messages i
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 11:53:38AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> I copied XF86Config from my old Woody system into the newly upgraded
> system and, while startx works just fine, wdm starts up but doesn't start
> the server, or log any messages in /var/log/wdm.log. (the log file exists,
> but is empt
I was gifted with a 2 gig SCSI drive, so the first thing I tried was
installing a system.
I installed Potato from a set of CheapBytes CDs, but did not set up X at
that time. Then I upgraded over PPP to the latest Woody archives. The
"automatic" X setup failed, but then I've never had that work for
At 10:57 +1100 2000-03-12, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>Also, libc6 tries to restart some NSS-using services, but never seems
>to succeed in restarting sshd. I end up with it refusing connections,
>although sshd still appears to be running (the original process and
>not a new one).
I guess that means th
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 08:10:07PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 08:32:07PM -0400, Nicolás Lichtmaier was heard to say:
> > > > Trouble ahead?
> > > Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> > > don't manage well the perl transition. This wil
> > > > Trouble ahead?
> > > Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> > > don't manage well the perl transition. This will be documented in the
> > > Release Notes.
> >
> > Why don't we make the new perls conflict the old apt?
>
> Augh, no don't do that!
>
> Upg
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, [iso-8859-1] Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > > Trouble ahead?
> > Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> > don't manage well the perl transition. This will be documented in the
> > Release Notes.
>
> Why don't we make the new perls conflict
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 08:32:07PM -0400, Nicolás Lichtmaier was heard to say:
> > > Trouble ahead?
> > Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> > don't manage well the perl transition. This will be documented in the
> > Release Notes.
>
> Why don't we make the ne
And/or make the new Perl pre-depend on the new apt, so the apt update
will happen before anything else?
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > > Trouble ahead?
> > Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> > don't manage well the perl transition. This w
> > Trouble ahead?
> Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> don't manage well the perl transition. This will be documented in the
> Release Notes.
Why don't we make the new perls conflict the old apt?
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 04:37:11PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 07:06:24PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt écrivait:
> > Trouble ahead?
>
> Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> don't manage well the perl transition. This will be documented in t
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 04:37:11PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog was heard to say:
> Le Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 07:06:24PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt écrivait:
> > Trouble ahead?
>
> Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> don't manage well the perl transition. This will be docu
Le Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 07:06:24PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt écrivait:
> Trouble ahead?
Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
don't manage well the perl transition. This will be documented in the
Release Notes.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -=- http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/
I just considered upgrading a slink server here to potato. I
apt-get updated and then ran apt-get dist-upgrade.
exim is held back, because libopenldap1 is uninstallable,
because libopenldap-runtime is uninstallable, because debconf
is uninstallable, because perl-5.004* is to be installed
rather t
libgtop0 now installs libraries with soname 1. Strange. In particular that
breaks lost of gnome apps depending on soname 0. If this is brought back
keep in mind that gtop has to be recompiled too since it depends on 1.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes | Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | G
37 matches
Mail list logo
