On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:34:34PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
[...]
> Why not ship SARGE with unrar-nonfree and provide a
[...]
> Maybe in ETCH.
[...]
> SARGE $USER are using now "unrar-nonfree" and in
[...]
> ETCH we can remove the virtual-package "unrar".
[...]
It's Sarge, and Etch. Please d
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Why not ship SARGE with unrar-nonfree and provide a
> virtualpackage "unrar" which point to the renamed one ?
you've never heard about Provides, isn't it?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:
Am 2005-05-22 14:36:50, schrieb Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> My rationale to do this, is:
>
> - woody shipped with a non-free unrar named 'unrar', and it worked
OK.
> - the free version is not functionally equivalent yet, of the .rar files
> in the wild, I couldn't actually find a single one that
On 5/27/05 9:16 AM, "Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 02:36:50PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>> On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:41:11AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> - rename the unrar-nonfree package back to unrar
>>> - rename the free unnrar package to u
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 02:36:50PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:41:11AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > - rename the unrar-nonfree package back to unrar
> > - rename the free unnrar package to unrar-free (it can even be left out
> > of sarge (version 0.0.1 that
Hi, all
I read all comments, but I didnt understood what I need to do.
Ola Lundqvist is my sponsor, but if Jeroen or other could upload , I
will be grateful, because Ola is very busyed.
Can I have 2 sponsors ?
You can have 900 if you can find 900 people replying to your requests
still
Hi, all
I read all comments, but I didnt understood what I need to do.
Ola Lundqvist is my sponsor, but if Jeroen or other could upload , I
will be grateful, because Ola is very busyed.
Can I have 2 sponsors ?
[]
Jose Carlos
I'm the (previous) maintainer of unrar. Jose Carlos Medeiros has o
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:04:07AM -0300, Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I read all comments, but I didnt understood what I need to do.
> Ola Lundqvist is my sponsor, but if Jeroen or other could upload , I
> will be grateful, because Ola is very busyed.
>
> Can I have 2 sponsors
I'm the (previous) maintainer of unrar. Jose Carlos Medeiros has offered to
adopt it.
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 02:36:50PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:41:11AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > - rename the unrar-nonfree package back to unrar
> > - rename the free unn
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:41:11AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> - rename the unrar-nonfree package back to unrar
> - rename the free unnrar package to unrar-free (it can even be left out
> of sarge (version 0.0.1 that is the one year old latest upstream
> version...))
> - get the non-free pack
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 05:59:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Then the new program should still have a higher version number, to allow
> > people who currently use the non-free program to upgrade to the free
> > program.
>
> That's why there's the
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 08:33:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:20:47AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > Repairing this issue by simply renaming the non-free package back to
> > unrar and giving the free program a different name should be pretty
> > straightforward
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:20:47AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:58:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 03:45:10PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > > Quoting Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >Why is the latest version in debian lower than
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 06:24:50PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Repairing this issue by simply renaming the non-free package back to
> > unrar and giving the free program a different name should be pretty
> > straightforward and doable for sarge.
> >
> Package unrar
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Repairing this issue by simply renaming the non-free package back to
> unrar and giving the free program a different name should be pretty
> straightforward and doable for sarge.
>
Package unrar
* stable (utils): Unarchiver for .rar files [non-free]
2.71-1: alpha
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:58:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 03:45:10PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > Quoting Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >Why is the latest version in debian lower than the one before?
> > >Regards Nico
> >
> > Becuase it is, in fact, a
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 03:45:10PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> Quoting Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Why is the latest version in debian lower than the one before?
>>> Regards Nico
>> Becuase it is, in fact, a different program. The hig
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 03:45:10PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Quoting Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >Why is the latest version in debian lower than the one before?
> >Regards Nico
>
> Becuase it is, in fact, a different program. The higher numbered releases
> are of a non-free version
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 09:55:08PM +0200, Rudi Effe wrote:
> the unfree packages have been renamed to unrar-nonfree. the unrar
> package in main is free - but does not support some current rar
> features.
"Some current rar features" is an understatement -- it doesn't support RAR
3.x archives at
Am Freitag, 20. Mai 2005 21:49 schrieb Nico Golde:
> Ah ok thats good news.
> Regards and thanks
> Nico
the unfree packages have been renamed to unrar-nonfree. the unrar
package in main is free - but does not support some current rar
features.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Hello Roberto,
* Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-20 21:48]:
> Quoting Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >I had a look on the unrar package and the version number
> >confuses me a little bit.
> >On http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/unrar.html you can see
> >the past uploads and wha
Quoting Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I had a look on the unrar package and the version number
confuses me a little bit.
On http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/unrar.html you can see
the past uploads and what confuses me is:
# [2004-07-05] Accepted 1:0.0.1-1 in unstable (low) (Niklas Vainio)
# [2
Hi,
I had a look on the unrar package and the version number
confuses me a little bit.
On http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/unrar.html you can see
the past uploads and what confuses me is:
# [2004-07-05] Accepted 1:0.0.1-1 in unstable (low) (Niklas Vainio)
# [2004-06-24] Accepted 3.3.6-2 in unstable
23 matches
Mail list logo
