Re: too long to build 2.6.14.2 kernel

Hello! On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:49:34 +0100, Andreas Orfanos wrote: > I try to produce some statistical data with different kernels. The > latest 2.4.32 takes an average 6 minutes to build (~500 > objects). But 2.6.0 takes more than half an hour for (~3000objects > and more). The latest 2.6.14.2

Re: too long to build 2.6.14.2 kernel

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 10:54:26AM +, Andreas Orfanos wrote: > My question is: Is this build time acceptable for the new kernels? > Is something wrong with the tool chain? Distribution? My question is: Is it a real problem? How often do you really compile your kernels yourself with all the mod

Re: too long to build 2.6.14.2 kernel

Yes! you are right. I try to produce some statistical data with different kernels. The latest 2.4.32 takes an average 6 minutes to build (~500 objects). But 2.6.0 takes more than half an hour for (~3000objects and more). The latest 2.6.14.2 one hour and more, and again we are talking for thousands

Re: too long to build 2.6.14.2 kernel

Le mardi 22 novembre 2005 à 10:54 +, Andreas Orfanos a écrit : > The delay was not due to lots of new modules, it was clear that the > incremental list of compiled components on the screen was moving > up slow. I remember kernel builds where ultra fast, couldn't watch on > screen what it was

Re: too long to build 2.6.14.2 kernel

[Andreas Orfanos] > I hope I post this to the right list. debian-user is probably the right list, actually. > The delay was not due to lots of new modules, it was clear that the > incremental list of compiled components on the screen was moving up > slow. I remember kernel builds where ultra fas

too long to build 2.6.14.2 kernel

Hi, I hope I post this to the right list. Last night I tried to build the latest version of Linux kernel 2.6.14-2, on my Debian 3.1. It took me around one hour to build.  I did the build on a system with a Pentium M at 2GHz. I tried also on another machine (3GHz) and it was a few minutes