Re: sysvinit-utils essentialness

2018-01-09 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 09 Jan 2018 at 04:04:39 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Using the pidof implementation provided by procps (upstream) would > mean we atleast use the same implementation as other distros, but > wouldn't gain us much else and could even give us new problems. The other gain would be that o

sysvinit-utils essentialness (was: Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile)

2018-01-08 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello all, Given I've poked a bit at what Simon mentions below in the past and don't really have any intention to follow this (and any other remaining item mentioned at [0]) through (and not aware of anyone else picking it up either), I thought I'd take this opportunity to share a bit about my vie