[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Noone in their right mind changes root's shell.
I guess you've diagnosed me, then! I did change it to "csh", and did not
move csh's binary to /bin because my /usr is on the same drive as root.
If anything got so bad that csh wasn't available, I'd be using a floppy root
t
On Tue, 3 Oct 1995, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Noone in their right mind changes root's shell. Creating an
> alternative root account with a different login name and tcsh as a
> shell would be the right thing to do.
Forgive my ignorance, but I thought that both bash and tcsh would be
available at all
Kenny Wickstrom writes ("symbolic links within /bin"):
> I was just looking around in /bin and noticed some symbolic links that
> may be incorrect. My system is 0.93R5+++ (I update the base regularly).
> The links I wonder about are
> csh -> ../usr/bin/tcsh
>
I was just looking around in /bin and noticed some symbolic links that
may be incorrect. My system is 0.93R5+++ (I update the base regularly).
The links I wonder about are
csh -> ../usr/bin/tcsh
rmail -> /usr/sbin/rmail
rnews -> /usr/sbin/rnews
smail -> /usr/sbin
4 matches
Mail list logo
