[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto C. Sanchez) writes:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:18:27AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>
>> I replicate the advantages of quilt by keeping quilt patches in
>> Subversion. This allows me to use svn-inject -o, which doesn't put
>> the upstream sources in version contr
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:18:27AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> I replicate the advantages of quilt by keeping quilt patches in
> Subversion. This allows me to use svn-inject -o, which doesn't put
> the upstream sources in version control at all - just the Debian
> directory.
>
> I like t
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 01:06:28PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently started to use svn for package maintenance, both in order to
> enable team maintenance and because it's a great way to keep track of the
> code.
>
> Previously I used dpatch or quilt for the Debian changes.
On Sunday 23 July 2006 20:28, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 01:42:26PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
> > martin f krafft wrote:
> > > Well, ideally the support tool should not impose on the structure
> >
> > Yes, svn-buildpackage is quite nice since it's easy to tell it about your
> >
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 01:42:26PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
> martin f krafft wrote:
> > Well, ideally the support tool should not impose on the structure
>
> Yes, svn-buildpackage is quite nice since it's easy to tell it about your
> layout. Something like that could work here as well.
>
> >
Hi,
> > SVN does not track merges across branches, unless you do it in the
> > changelog.
>
> I know, it's a pain in the neck. But still it's a good step forward over
> CVS, and seems to be quite popular in Debian. I hope svn will improve in
> this area.
svn/cvs et cetera are quite linear; dpatc
martin f krafft wrote:
> Well, ideally the support tool should not impose on the structure
Yes, svn-buildpackage is quite nice since it's easy to tell it about your
layout. Something like that could work here as well.
> SVN does not track merges across branches, unless you do it in the
> changelo
also sprach Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.23.1206 +0100]:
> Previously I used dpatch or quilt for the Debian changes. However
> with svn (or any other version control system) it really doesn't
> make sense to use that. The VCS is great at keeping track of
> changesets.
Is it? Try keep
Hello,
I've recently started to use svn for package maintenance, both in order to
enable team maintenance and because it's a great way to keep track of the
code.
Previously I used dpatch or quilt for the Debian changes. However with svn
(or any other version control system) it really doesn't make
9 matches
Mail list logo
