Re: Bug#454313: status of bazaar

2008-06-18 Thread Ian Jackson
Ben Finney writes ("Re: Bug#454313: status of bazaar"): > James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Baz is unmaintained, and it would be great to remove it for lenny. > > It's also a necessary step in preparation to have the current, > non-ancient Bazaa

Re: Bug#454313: status of bazaar

2008-06-12 Thread Ben Finney
James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Baz is unmaintained, and it would be great to remove it for lenny. It's also a necessary step in preparation to have the current, non-ancient Bazaar VCS http://bazaar-vcs.org/> installed by a package named "bazaar". -- \ "To label any subj

Re: status of bazaar

2008-06-12 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:20:25PM +, James Westby wrote: > On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 10:56 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > Bazaar currently suffers from #454313, but has reverse dependencies > > which prevent its sane removal from testing. It looks to me that bazaar > > is unmaintained upstream,

Re: status of bazaar

2008-06-11 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 10:56 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Bazaar currently suffers from #454313, but has reverse dependencies > which prevent its sane removal from testing. It looks to me that bazaar > is unmaintained upstream, the last 4 uploads in Debian are NMUs, and > almost nobody is using i

status of bazaar

2008-06-05 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Bazaar currently suffers from #454313, but has reverse dependencies which prevent its sane removal from testing. It looks to me that bazaar is unmaintained upstream, the last 4 uploads in Debian are NMUs, and almost nobody is using it nowadays. The r-deps are: * pybaz ; * config-manager (h