Bastien ROUCARIES writes:
> Yes one question do I need to document aclocal.m4 copyright patchwork ?
My take on this (but note that I'm not an ftpmaster):
The debian/copyright file serves two separate purposes. First, it's
included in binary packages to provide our mandatory license and copyrig
Charles Plessy wrote:
> I would love the answer to this question documented somewhere, but I think
> that it would not belong to the DEP 5 document. If you would like, you
> can send the question to the FTP Master team and CC the bug number #462996
> (“Document requirements for copyright file.”).
Le Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:07:54PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
>
> Yes one question do I need to document aclocal.m4 copyright patchwork ?
Dear Bastien,
judging from the packages that are accepted in our archive, the empirical
answer is no. Nevertheless, the DEP 5 format and any free-for
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 01/17/2012 01:44 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:14:26PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>
>>> FTR given that I got no reports of problems with DEP-3, that it's already
>>> well established, I just changed the state
On 01/17/2012 01:44 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:14:26PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
>> FTR given that I got no reports of problems with DEP-3, that it's already
>> well established, I just changed the state of the DEP-3 from CANDIDATE
>> to ACCEPTED.
>>
>> Of cours
5 matches
Mail list logo
