On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 02:23:26PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> It looks like providing .la and pkg-config files to explain how to build
> it statically
> looks like necessary. newt doesn't ordinarily use libtool, so I need to
> generate a .la
> file and include it in the libnewt-dev. Current
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>
>
>> On Dec 14, Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> So where do people think the bug lies?
>>> - Should libdl be compiled into libnewt.a ?
>>>
>> Yes.
>>
>
> Is there even a libdl.a?
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Dec 14, Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So where do people think the bug lies?
>> - Should libdl be compiled into libnewt.a ?
> Yes.
Is there even a libdl.a?
And what if I have libfoo.a libbar.a libblub.a all using dlopen?
Should
Le jeudi 14 décembre 2006 à 11:56 +, Alastair McKinstry a écrit :
> partimage depends on libnewt, which I maintain. libnewt-dev ships libnewt.a.
> libnewt opportunistically links to libfribidi if it is present; it uses
> dlopen() to do so.
>
> However the partimage build fails when done with '
On Dec 14, Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So where do people think the bug lies?
> - Should libdl be compiled into libnewt.a ?
Yes.
> - Should the static version of libnewt be built differently so as to
> not call dlopen()?
Maybe.
> - if so, any recommendations on how?
Rem
Hi,
I've an interesting bug scenario sent to me by someone trying to build
partimage statically.
The partimage build is being done to make a small minimal-environment
binary (sort of boot-cd, etc.).
partimage depends on libnewt, which I maintain. libnewt-dev ships libnewt.a.
libnewt opportunistic
6 matches
Mail list logo
