Am 2007-05-07 13:13:59, schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 11:13:50AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > I don't know how much this helps, but wouldn't it be good to more
> > actively *recommend* the posters to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Something like a monthly reminder sent
Andrei Popescu:
> > Next spammers will go ahead and whitelist themselves, too.
>
> Then what is the purpose of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The purpose is quite clear, the real question would be how whitelist@
manages suscribing, whitelisting. Is this only by been suscribed? Or
does some other policy apply?
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 01:13:59PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > I don't know how much this helps, but wouldn't it be good to more
> > actively *recommend* the posters to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Something like a monthly reminder sent over all lists or similar.
>
> Next spammers wil
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 01:13:59PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > I don't know how much this helps, but wouldn't it be good to more
> > actively *recommend* the posters to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Something like a monthly reminder sent over all lists or similar.
>
> Next spammers wil
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 11:13:50AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:01:36PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>
> > I belive that a rate of 0.1% is quite an acceptable rate, but we
> > permanently try to lower that.
>
> I don't know how much this helps, but wouldn't it be
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:01:36PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> I belive that a rate of 0.1% is quite an acceptable rate, but we
> permanently try to lower that.
I don't know how much this helps, but wouldn't it be good to more
actively *recommend* the posters to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECT
Qua, 2007-04-25 às 13:50 -0500, David Moreno Garza escreveu:
> Steve Greenland wrote:
> > I'd guess that Bugzilla's mandatory registration is why. OTOH,
> > Bugzilla's mandatory is why I rarely report bugs for projects that use
> > Bugzilla. I don't think making it harder for users to report proble
Steve Greenland wrote:
> I'd guess that Bugzilla's mandatory registration is why. OTOH,
> Bugzilla's mandatory is why I rarely report bugs for projects that use
> Bugzilla. I don't think making it harder for users to report problems is
> a good trade-off.
I totally agree on this. The easier we get
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:45:06PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> I have been dealing with gcc's bugzilla, KDE's bugs.kde.org, mozilla's bug
> tracking system etc., I never ever received any spam messages from these
> bug tracking systems. The spam emails seem to come only from BTS. May be w
On 25-Apr-07, 11:45 (CDT), Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been dealing with gcc's bugzilla, KDE's bugs.kde.org, mozilla's bug
> tracking system etc., I never ever received any spam messages from these
> bug tracking systems. The spam emails seem to come only from BTS. Ma
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>> > How does everyone deal with this (I mean other than filtering)?
>>
>> If anyone is doing a substantially better job of filtering than the
>> bts is, let [EMAIL PROTECTED] know; but in general you should just
>> see the few spammers who end up being successful.
>
I
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 17:01 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Perhaps we should really propose a "Day of No Spam-Filtering" on
> lists.d.o. ;-)
Umm, is there enough BANDWIDTH ON THE ENTARWEB to support that?
/me thinks not
--
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The technology that is
Stronger, better, fas
Hi,
On Wed Apr 25, 2007 at 01:08:32 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> > Of late, I have been seeing a lot of spam from bugs.debian.org . I never got
> > this many spam emails from BTS. Has something changed?
>
> Not
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Of late, I have been seeing a lot of spam from bugs.debian.org . I never got
> this many spam emails from BTS. Has something changed?
Not really; it's just the continuing battle between spammers and Blars
(and to a lesser extent, the
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 06:04, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Of late, I have been seeing a lot of spam from bugs.debian.org . I
> never got this many spam emails from BTS. Has something changed? How
> does everyone deal with this (I mean other than filtering)?
Yes, both the admins o
Of late, I have been seeing a lot of spam from bugs.debian.org . I never got
this many spam emails from BTS. Has something changed? How does everyone
deal with this (I mean other than filtering)?
hth
raju
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/
http
16 matches
Mail list logo
