Re: some thoughts on DEP-5

2011-05-21 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, May 21, 2011 at 01:43:25AM -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > > 1) The description of the License field says: > > >Otherwise, this field should either include the full text of the > > >license(s) or include a pointer to the license file under > > >`/usr/share/com

Re: some thoughts on DEP-5

2011-05-21 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sb, 21 mai 11, 09:55:48, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 11-05-20 at 07:53pm, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > > > 3) Just a cosmetic/perfectionist issue: > > People would probably simply use the examples in DEP5 for the > > formulation of their pointers, currently: > > >On Debian systems, the f

Re: some thoughts on DEP-5

2011-05-21 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 11-05-20 at 07:53pm, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > 1) The description of the License field says: > >Otherwise, this field should either include the full text > >of the license(s) or include a pointer to the license file under > >`/usr/share/common-licenses`. > > This could be interpreted as

Re: some thoughts on DEP-5

2011-05-20 Thread Joey Hess
Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > 1) The description of the License field says: > >Otherwise, this field should either include the full text > >of the license(s) or include a pointer to the license file under > >`/usr/share/common-licenses`. > > This could be interpreted as if just the pointer wou

some thoughts on DEP-5

2011-05-20 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hi. I wrote the following some time ago to Lars and Steve. The former asked be to rather put it up for general discussion (which I forgot then somehow). So here it is... Please note, that this may be outdated by now, but I couldn't check the current revision, as http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ s