Re: sgml-tools and super weirdness

1999-05-24 Thread Martin Schulze
Richard Braakman wrote: > With super, the slink version was a separate NMU for frozen, while that > version was already in unstable. So the changelogs are different, and > they are differnet compiles. ARGS. diff -Nur slink/usr/doc/super/changelog.Debian potato/usr/doc/super/changelog.Debian ---

Re: sgml-tools and super weirdness

1999-05-24 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Mon, 24 May 1999, Richard Braakman wrote: > With super, the slink version was a separate NMU for frozen, while that > version was already in unstable. So the changelogs are different, and > they are differnet compiles. That's all good and well, but we -MUST NOT- have different compiles with

Re: sgml-tools and super weirdness

1999-05-23 Thread Richard Braakman
With super, the slink version was a separate NMU for frozen, while that version was already in unstable. So the changelogs are different, and they are differnet compiles. With sgml-tools, I can find only this oddity: Suggests: bsdmainutils Optional: groff, latex, dvips, texinfo, info-browser It

sgml-tools and super weirdness

1999-05-23 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
Can someone please explain this to me.. Some time ago I installed sgml-tools, my /var/lib/dpkg/status entry for it looks like this: Package: sgml-tools Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: text Installed-Size: 757 Maintainer: Sven Rudolph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Version: 1.0.9-1 R