Re: Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2014-01-04 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op 28-12-13 21:52, René Kuligowski schreef: > Hi Adrian, > > > Thanks for your quick answer,… but (sounds like a pouting little boy, I > know): > Sorry, but I cannot file a bug report against, say, nvidia-glx, because > it is most likely not the cause. The problem is far more likely kernel > 3.x

Re: Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-29 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:37:05AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > [...] > Again, I don't understand why you are becoming huffy and impolite. I am > still trying to help you and you fail to follow my instructions. You > are not helping your case at all and you are not showing yourself > i

Re: Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-29 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 12/29/2013 05:59 AM, René Kuligowski wrote: >> This is a common fallacy: Just because a piece of hardware is working >> properly on Windows doesn't mean anything is adherent to the >> specifications. The reason why your hardware is running on Windows >> without any problems is that the manufactu

Re: Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-28 Thread René Kuligowski
On 29.12.2013 01:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: This is a common fallacy: Just because a piece of hardware is working properly on Windows doesn't mean anything is adherent to the specifications. The reason why your hardware is running on Windows without any problems is that the manufactu

Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Rene, On 12/29/2013 04:06 AM, René Kuligowski wrote: > OK, this is not fun when people just get pissed because they don't read > –– or don't want to read –– what a person writes, and answer with > thoughtless or arrogant statements. I didn't post this in debian-devel > out of boredom; I wrote to

Re: Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 12/29/2013 03:55 AM, René Kuligowski wrote: >> You can still file the bug report against a particular package. If it >> turns out to be assigned to the wrong package, we can still change >> that afterwards at any time. > Right, I just wanted to spare us from the trouble by getting one or the > o

Re: Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 01:57 -0100, René Kuligowski wrote: > > On 28.12.2013 23:46, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 19:52 -0100, René Kuligowski wrote: > > > >> Hi Adrian, > >> > >> > >> Thanks for your quick answer,… but (sounds like a pouting little boy, I > >> know): > >> Sorr

Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-28 Thread René Kuligowski
OK, this is not fun when people just get pissed because they don't read –– or don't want to read –– what a person writes, and answer with thoughtless or arrogant statements. I didn't post this in debian-devel out of boredom; I wrote to you because it didn't seem to fit anywhere else. I thank

Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-28 Thread René Kuligowski
Original Message Subject:Re: Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64 Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 01:57:50 -0100 From: René Kuligowski To: Ben Hutchings On 28.12.2013 23:46, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 19:52 -0100, René Kuligowski wrote

Re: Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-28 Thread René Kuligowski
On 28.12.2013 19:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: You can still file the bug report against a particular package. If it turns out to be assigned to the wrong package, we can still change that afterwards at any time. Right, I just wanted to spare us from the trouble by getting one or the o

Re: Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 19:52 -0100, René Kuligowski wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > > Thanks for your quick answer,… but (sounds like a pouting little boy, I > know): > Sorry, but I cannot file a bug report against, say, nvidia-glx, because > it is most likely not the cause. Sure it is. > The problem is

Re: Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Rene! On 12/28/2013 09:52 PM, René Kuligowski wrote: > Thanks for your quick answer,… but (sounds like a pouting little boy, I > know): > Sorry, but I cannot file a bug report against, say, nvidia-glx, because > it is most likely not the cause. The problem is far more likely kernel > 3.x- and/

Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-28 Thread René Kuligowski
Hi Adrian, Thanks for your quick answer,… but (sounds like a pouting little boy, I know): Sorry, but I cannot file a bug report against, say, nvidia-glx, because it is most likely not the cause. The problem is far more likely kernel 3.x- and/or gcc-related, and I need somebody who knows more in

Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hello Rene! On 12/28/2013 08:40 AM, René Kuligowski wrote: > concerning: older AMD64 computers + 3.x kernel, > X11 + native NVidia drivers + FVWM or WMII, > and some other SIGSEGV'ing apps This is too unspecific, unfortunately. You should file a bug report for each machine

several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2013-12-27 Thread René Kuligowski
concerning: older AMD64 computers + 3.x kernel, X11 + native NVidia drivers + FVWM or WMII, and some other SIGSEGV'ing apps Good morning, the following case made me put debian 7.3 aside and keep using debian 6.0.7: I am using an older AMD64 AthlonXP Core 2 3800+, accompa