On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:42:35 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
[...]
> Internet mail
> addresses (which are passed to /usr/sbin/sendmail, for instance) must be
> canonicalized before they are used in SMTP. At least that's the theory;
> Exim doesn't do it.
And apparently on purpose:
Exim delibe
* martin f. krafft:
> also sprach Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1145 +0100]:
>> RFC 1123 contains this requirement:
>>
>> 5.2.2 Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1
>>
>> The domain names that a Sender-SMTP sends in MAIL and RCPT
>> commands MUST have b
also sprach Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1145 +0100]:
> RFC 1123 contains this requirement:
>
> 5.2.2 Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1
>
> The domain names that a Sender-SMTP sends in MAIL and RCPT
> commands MUST have been "canonicalized," i.e., t
RFC 1123 contains this requirement:
5.2.2 Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1
The domain names that a Sender-SMTP sends in MAIL and RCPT
commands MUST have been "canonicalized," i.e., they must be
fully-qualified principal names or domain literals, not
Hello martin,
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.09.2026 +0100]:
>> how about sending mails from master.debian.org with either
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
>
> I couldn't sign those messages.
Give mutt a new sen
Thanks, Ian, for your reply. I don't quite agree with it though.
also sprach Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.09.2102 +0100]:
> The prevailing IETF standard for mail transmission over the Internet
> is STD-10 (RFC821), which says:
RFC 2821 obsoletes STD-10, and says:
3.6 Domains
Only
martin f krafft writes ("seeking: Ian Jackson"):
> In the mean time, I'd be grateful if Ian gave me a means to
> communicate with him. Or if someone would offer to relay a message
> to him.
A few people have drawn my attention to this thread, thanks. For
future reference
also sprach Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.09.2026 +0100]:
> how about sending mails from master.debian.org with either
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
I couldn't sign those messages. But I could temporarily set mutt's
$envelope_from_address. Thanks for the hint.
--
Hi,
On Tue Oct 09, 2007 at 19:36:49 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] expands to a greenend.org.uk address, and the mx for that
> domain refuses to accept my mail.
>
> : host
> mx-relay.chiark.greenend.org.uk[212.13.197.229] said: 550
> invalid MAIL-FROM: Error during DNS
I don't really think we need to have this discussion on
debian-devel. Sorry for not setting reply-to. I will not post more
than this one reply, which I hope sets things straight.
also sprach Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.09.2015 +0100]:
> RFC 1034 section 3.6.2:
>
> Domain names
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] expands to a greenend.org.uk address, and the mx for that
> domain refuses to accept my mail.
>
> : host
> mx-relay.chiark.greenend.org.uk[212.13.197.229] said: 550
> invalid MAIL-FROM: Error during DNS MX lookup for
> lap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] expands to a greenend.org.uk address, and the mx for that
domain refuses to accept my mail.
: host
mx-relay.chiark.greenend.org.uk[212.13.197.229] said: 550
invalid MAIL-FROM: Error during DNS MX lookup for
lapse.madduck.net: DNS alias found where canonical name wante
12 matches
Mail list logo
