Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >* New upstream release (closes: #270944, #277543). It's less than two
> > weeks since this was released; may you contract an interesting
> > venereal disease.
>
> Is this really called for in changelogs? Note that the
On 10-Jan-05, 13:55 (CST), Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Greenland dijo [Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 06:44:24PM -0600]:
> > Not really called for, but I understand the frustration with people who
> > have nothing better to do than nag, and (for the second bug) without
> > even checking t
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well... DJB was not trying to be specially nice
Is DJB _capable_ of being nice?!?
-Miles
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Greenland dijo [Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 06:44:24PM -0600]:
> > Is this really called for in changelogs? Note that the bug reports were
> > perfectly polite.
>
> Not really called for, but I understand the frustration with people who
> have nothing better to do than nag, and (for the second bug)
* Steve Langasek:
[DJB's vulnerability research course]
> Considering the assignment AIUI was "find security holes",
I think the assignment was "find potential security holes and prove
that they are security holes, by writing exploits". The first part is
easy, just compile any sufficiently obsc
* Joey Hess:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
>>* New upstream release (closes: #270944, #277543). It's less than two
>> weeks since this was released; may you contract an interesting
>> venereal disease.
>
> Is this really called for in changelogs? Note that the bug reports were
> perfectly
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 06:44:24PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > Imagining myself as a student in this class: I complete the requested
> > assignment, with luck make an A, only to have the prof post it to the
> > internet and then be insulted by perfect strangers as they use my work
> > to fix
On 08-Jan-05, 15:08 (CST), Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this really called for in changelogs? Note that the bug reports were
> perfectly polite.
Not really called for, but I understand the frustration with people who
have nothing better to do than nag, and (for the second bug) withou
Em SÃb, 2005-01-08 Ãs 16:08 -0500, Joey Hess escreveu:
> [...]
> Is this really called for in changelogs? Note that the bug reports were
> perfectly polite.
I completely agree on this. Rudeness, be it gratuitous or in response to
someone else's rudeness is surely not something we want recorded in
Andrew Suffield wrote:
>* New upstream release (closes: #270944, #277543). It's less than two
> weeks since this was released; may you contract an interesting
> venereal disease.
Is this really called for in changelogs? Note that the bug reports were
perfectly polite.
Here's another
10 matches
Mail list logo
