[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> Should I send you a photocopy of the original cdroms that I used to
> install on my system?
Actually, that can be useful, if only to verify just what version was
installed :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
The Fungi writes:
> Perhaps I'm missing something, but it seems to me that it would be more
> effective to try to get http://www.callwave.com/members/cancel/ bumped up
> to the top of the google search instead.
Now that sounds sensible.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
David Pashley writes:
> I'd hope that people actually clicked on the page in question rather
> than just seeing the email address in the summary on the google search.
We don't hear from those ones.
> But yes, I agree that some users are occasionally stupid or lazy or both.
Those we do hear from.
David Pashley wrote:
> John Hasler praised the llamas by saying:
> > And helping people get off C4LL W4VE is not our job.
>
> Surely we should do our best to help all computer users, not just Debian
> users. :)
It is not practical nor even possible to do so. The noise is
overwhelming!
I have a p
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:44:41PM +0100, David Pashley wrote:
[...]
> Even still, it's worth trying to get
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/01/msg01444.html bumped
> up to the top of the google search all the same.
[...]
Perhaps I'm missing something, but it seems to me that it would b
On Sep 05, 2005 at 18:33, John Hasler praised the llamas by saying:
> David Pashley writes:
> > No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on Google.
>
> If these people read the messages they find with their searches they
> wouldn't post here. They don't. They just grab the add
Just fix the program that generates our HTML mailing list archives, and
make it output for mails which
contain any of the Forbidden Words!
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | 0x888354F7
¯ '` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> I wonder if it would be possible to appeal to google to have them
> manually edit that search so that l.d.o doesn't appear. (Same for
> [replaced with "string instrument" to avoid another google hit]'s)
What I think I would rather see is targeted moderation of anything
David Pashley writes:
> No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on Google.
If these people read the messages they find with their searches they
wouldn't post here. They don't. They just grab the address and spam us.
And helping people get off C4LL W4VE is not our job.
> I b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Proulx wrote:
> David Pashley wrote:
>
>>> Don't follow up. Reply to them privately.
>>
>> No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on
>> Google.
>
>
> That is exactly the point. We DO NOT WANT people to find the
> Debian mailin
On Sep 05, 2005 at 18:14, Bob Proulx praised the llamas by saying:
> David Pashley wrote:
> > > Don't follow up. Reply to them privately.
> >
> > No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on Google.
>
> That is exactly the point. We DO NOT WANT people to find the Debian
> mail
David Pashley wrote:
> > Don't follow up. Reply to them privately.
>
> No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on Google.
That is exactly the point. We DO NOT WANT people to find the Debian
mailing lists in any relation to that search. Every time someone
references it in a
On Sep 05, 2005 at 17:13, John Hasler praised the llamas by saying:
> David Pashley writes:
> > I believe it is far more useful to follow up to these emails providing
> > useful information how to remove themselves and in particular link to the
> > rather informative email from Josh Metzler[0] so t
David Pashley writes:
> I believe it is far more useful to follow up to these emails providing
> useful information how to remove themselves and in particular link to the
> rather informative email from Josh Metzler[0] so that they might find out
> how to do it themselves rather than emailing the l
On Sep 05, 2005 at 16:31, John Hasler praised the llamas by saying:
> Please do not follow up to these messages. These idiots apparently Google
> the phrase and then spam all the addresses they find. Posting about the
> subject here just creates more hits.
I believe it is far more useful to foll
Please do not follow up to these messages. These idiots apparently Google
the phrase and then spam all the addresses they find. Posting about the
subject here just creates more hits.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Sep 05, 2005 at 15:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] praised the llamas by saying:
>I notified you, electronically a month or more ago to cancel my
>subscription to CALL WAVE.
>This billing has continued on my VISA bill for two or more months.
>
>Will you acknowledge receipt of this current
On Monday 05 September 2005 16:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I notified you, electronically a month or more ago to cancel my
> subscription to CALL WAVE.
> This billing has continued on my VISA bill for two or more months.
>
> Will you acknowledge receipt of this current message? I would like a
>
I notified you, electronically a month or more ago to cancel my subscription to CALL WAVE.
This billing has continued on my VISA bill for two or more months.
Will you acknowledge receipt of this current message? I would like a credit memo for the last month or two, but I know this action will
Please remove me from "Call Wave" I have signed up for local Comcast
broadband, and no longer need this service.
Thank you,
ok now how can i get my password from a for callwave, ihave it all install
please as soon as possible.
Please remove me from call wave as I no longer need it. Thomas
Matey
this program is not right for me and my
family
thank you for your help
Pls remove me from Call Wave
I no longer need the service. Please remove
me immediately.
thank you.
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 08:09:25PM -0500, Heyer Family wrote:
> Please remove me from call wave.
What part of the email address looks
like it screams out "we are part of Call Wave"?
Please get your facts straight next time.
Yours sincerel
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 08:09:25PM -0500, Heyer Family wrote:
> Please remove me from call wave.
> Thanks
Please see http://wiki.debian.net/?DuelingBanjoes for instructions.
Regards,
Paddy
--
Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Please remove me from call wave.
Thanks
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:03:36PM -0800, Christine Dawson wrote:
> hi i was wondering if i can get call wave off my computer i dont want it
> any more and i dont know how to get rid of it thank you very much christine
>
Please see
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/msg10
hi i was wondering if i can get call wave off my computer i dont want it any
more and i dont know how to get rid of it thank you very much christine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please remove me from "Call Wave" I have signed up for local Comcast broadband, and no longer need this service.
Thank you,
Jo-Anne M. Soares
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 24 January 2005 07:40 pm, Jack wrote:
> PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM CALL WAVE
>
> JAMES H. SCOTT, SR.
> 618 355 0976
>
>
> PeoplePC Online
> A better way to Internet
> http://www.peoplepc.com
We can't remove you f
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM CALL WAVE
JAMES H. SCOTT, SR.
618 355 0976
PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:07:06 +0100, Christian Perrier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Michelle Konzack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > rm -rf [EMAIL PROTECTED] >/dev/null
> Nope, you're definitely wrong. The correct command line should be:
>
> cd "call wave" ; rm -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] >/dev/null
>
Quoting Michelle Konzack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> rm -rf [EMAIL PROTECTED] >/dev/null
Nope, you're definitely wrong. The correct command line should be:
cd "call wave" ; rm -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] >/dev/null
The user explicitely asked for being removed from call wave only.:)
I'm pretty sure other
rm -rf [EMAIL PROTECTED] >/dev/null
done.
Am 2005-01-10 13:49:57, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> remove me from call wave. thank you
- ENE OF REPLYED MESSAGE -
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.
from:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
remove me from call wave. thank you
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 22:47, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > Debian-devel is now result number four when googling for "callwave
> > remove" (without quotes).
>
> Ah, the Duelling Banjos Effect.
>
Weird, I wouldn't jugde this people capable of using google for solving
problems their minds can't fat
Hi Henning!
You wrote:
> Debian-devel is now result number four when googling for "callwave
> remove" (without quotes).
Ah, the Duelling Banjos Effect.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7
Henning Makholm writes:
> I still wonder what the people posting here are thinking, though.
Probably the same thing as the one who emailed me personally (cc'ing
debian-user) asking for help with his "AO*L a*rt fi*le" problem.
--
John Hasler
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> remove me from callwave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is getting as bad as the du*ling b*njos phenomenon.
For some time I just thought that "callwave" must an AOLism for a
discussion forum, and that the posters wanted to unsubscribe from
debian-devel. However
remove me from callwave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
43 matches
Mail list logo
