Re: removal of Qt3

2012-05-22 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 05/21/2012 09:09 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Neil Williams wrote: > >> Does LSB matter? > > LSB is irrelevant to me personally since I'm mostly not interested in > running proprietary software on Linux systems. > > I guess LSB must be relevant to Debian since we ha

Re: removal of Qt3

2012-05-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Neil Williams wrote: > Does LSB matter? LSB is irrelevant to me personally since I'm mostly not interested in running proprietary software on Linux systems. I guess LSB must be relevant to Debian since we have it in Debian and even have a mailing list dedicated t

Re: removal of Qt3

2012-05-20 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:03:04 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Ana Guerrero wrote: > > > In the last days, I have taken a look into how much needed to be done to > > remove Qt3 and there were slightly more than 50 packages depending directly > > or indirectly from Qt3. A

Re: removal of Qt3

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Ana Guerrero wrote: > In the last days, I have taken a look into how much needed to be done to > remove Qt3 and there were slightly more than 50 packages depending directly > or indirectly from Qt3. A removal from Wheezy seemed doable > given that removing package

removal of Qt3

2012-05-20 Thread Ana Guerrero
Hi, A couple of weeks ago was the first anniversary of orphaning Qt3 in Debian http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/msg00236.html The orphaning bug is #625502 In this year, Qt3 has got a few QA uploads with the most relevant change being support to multiarch. And, more importantly, nobod