Re: recovery status update

2003-12-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-09 15:37]: > Although I agree that there is definitely something to be said for > this approach, I would like to note an additional issue with it: > > - how to verify that katie will process uploads as expected (I'd been > running dinstall -n, via dpu

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-09 22:14]: > Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > - how to run madison and wanna-build > > I thought the idea was for the unrestricted mirror to include a > read-only copy of the database madison consults. Yes, the idea is to sync the Postgre

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-09 09:49]: > - how to give developers the possibility of seeing what's in the queue > (daily rsyncs are not good enough for this; I've frequently pulled > packages from the accepted queue to check that bug fixes have been > correctly applied) The

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-10 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:14:08PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > - how to run madison and wanna-build > > I thought the idea was for the unrestricted mirror to include a > read-only copy of the database madison consults. > > wanna-build presumably ne

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-10 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>- how to run madison and wanna-build > > > I thought the idea was for the unrestricted mirror to include a > read-only copy of the database madison consults. > > wanna-build presumably needs more real-time access, though. Ma

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-09 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - how to run madison and wanna-build I thought the idea was for the unrestricted mirror to include a read-only copy of the database madison consults. wanna-build presumably needs more real-time access, though. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-09 Thread Clint Adams
> - how to run the DELAYED queue (to give the possibility of deleting > things from it or to see what's in it) > > - how to give developers the possibility of seeing what's in the queue > (daily rsyncs are not good enough for this; I've frequently pulled > packages from the accepted queue to

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-09 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:37:55PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: >> - how to verify that katie will process uploads as expected (I'd been >> running dinstall -n, via dput -D; I suppose it would be possible to >> upload separately to the mirror and test t

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:37:55PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > - how to verify that katie will process uploads as expected (I'd been > running dinstall -n, via dput -D; I suppose it would be possible to > upload separately to the mirror and test there, but that's awkward.) Seems to me that,

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-09 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It makes a lot of sense to restrict auric permanently and have an > up-to-date mirror for general access purposes. The issues I can think > of are: Although I agree that there is definitely something to be said for this approach, I would like to note a

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:51:54AM +, James Troup wrote: > Where can I login? > -- > > There's been a fair bit of talk post-compromise about restricting > access to machines running (core) services. At the moment, the only >

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-07 Thread Roland Bauerschmidt
Steve Langasek wrote: > Hmm, I'm pretty sure the box is running stable, so this should be a > non-issue (for now). I see; thanks for the clarification. I just wanted to make sure... Roland

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:17:25PM +0100, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote: > James Troup wrote: > > As part of the recovery process, db.debian.org has migrated, both to a > > new host (because the old box was on it's last legs and HP kindly > > donated a shiny new one to replace it), and to a newer vers

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-05 Thread Roland Bauerschmidt
James Troup wrote: > As part of the recovery process, db.debian.org has migrated, both to a > new host (because the old box was on it's last legs and HP kindly > donated a shiny new one to replace it), and to a newer version of LDAP > (because it was still using potato's OpenLDAP). Which exact ver

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-05 Thread Christian Kurz
Hi James, first let me thank you for your good work so far on the recovery of the debian machines. I just wanted to add one note: On [05/12/03 1:51], James Troup wrote: > Use the anonymous upload queue on ftp-master. I believe you want to > use something like "dupload --to anonymous-ftp-master