Re: raising an issue about static linking policy

2014-08-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 05:18 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: [...] > - I really don't understand Linus' comment about the binary > compatibility. The problem is that libgit does not provide > binary compatibility, while most libraries do try to provide > the ABI compatible and that we have various

Re: raising an issue about static linking policy

2014-08-28 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:38:49PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently packaged subsurface 4.2 for experimental, because it depends on > libgit2 which is in experimental... > > I think you might want to read these posts: > http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2014-A

Re: raising an issue about static linking policy

2014-08-28 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently packaged subsurface 4.2 for experimental, because it depends on > libgit2 which is in experimental… > > I think you might want to read these posts: > http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2014-August/014520.

raising an issue about static linking policy

2014-08-28 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
Hello, I've recently packaged subsurface 4.2 for experimental, because it depends on libgit2 which is in experimental… I think you might want to read these posts: http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2014-August/014520.html http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2014-August/01452