[redirecting to -devel where this belongs]
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:11:59PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > --
> > > Question to the release and archive people: Is there such a
> > > requirement? Will such architectures inde
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:14:01AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:47:35PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > Could these mails be required to have a valid GPG signature (either
> > for a key in a public keyserver or a DD key)? This would eliminate the
> > spam problem (almost
If you don't want to read the rant, skip to the bottom where I volunteer
to help
Anthony Towns wrote:
>In the mail to the DPL I mentioned above, James outlined three fairly
>significant technical changes that could be implemented to make the
>job easier, and could be done by anyone, without r
[Ways to improve keyring maintenance]
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 23:25 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> The second was to get rt setup to, uh, track requests -- it's waiting
> on the first thing (since rt sends auto-replies, and auto-replies to
> spam is bad, mmmkay), and possibly also lacks a debian.org
Let's move this to elsewhere than -vote for technical discussion, d-ppc and
d-ppc64 are good places for this.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:21:12AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:03:47PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Are bruckner and voltaire overloaded or do they lack se
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:47:35PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Could these mails be required to have a valid GPG signature (either
> for a key in a public keyserver or a DD key)? This would eliminate the
> spam problem (almost) entirely.
keyring-maint is the address for problems with your key --
[Moving this to -devel, please reply only there, this is not really
voting related stuff. We are talking about things to improve keyring
maintenance, for those not reading -vote.]
Anthony Towns writes:
> So first one was the spam problem, keyring-maint is a well-known address,
> and mails that ar
7 matches
Mail list logo
