Ben Finney wrote on 2011-10-08 07:34:
> Why did it take so long? Aptitude shows immediately that ‘duply’ was to
> be removed because ‘duplicity’ was to be removed; and looking one step
Usually I use Debian Stable as productive system. So aptitude would be
not a help. I looked on packages.qa.debia
Joachim Wiedorn writes:
> But nevertheless I had to analyse the removing of my package (duply).
> After a while
Why did it take so long? Aptitude shows immediately that ‘duply’ was to
be removed because ‘duplicity’ was to be removed; and looking one step
further, that ‘duplicity’ was to be remov
David Prévot wrote on 2011-10-06 21:26:
> Sure: “All developers are expected to be subscribed to this list.” [0],
> but Oliver was referring to “users”. On the other hand, his example mail
> (To: duplic...@packages.debian.org) is obviously sent to developers, so
> I'd guess no harm is done for ou
3 matches
Mail list logo
