Re: post-sarge transitions: slang

2005-03-17 Thread Alastair McKinstry
On CÃad, 2005-03-16 at 02:33 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Alastair, > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:30:58PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > > >* Steve Langasek > > > > > >| If you are planning any other transitions that will affect a lot of > > >| packages, please let us know in advance.

Re: post-sarge transitions: slang

2005-03-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:39:11PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > slang should, I hope, be a fairly small change; OTOH, we seem to still have > > conflicting slang1 and slang1a-utf8 packages in the archive (conflicting > > -dev packages at least), so it would certainly be nice to wrap this up

Re: post-sarge transitions: slang

2005-03-16 Thread Christian Perrier
> slang should, I hope, be a fairly small change; OTOH, we seem to still have > conflicting slang1 and slang1a-utf8 packages in the archive (conflicting > -dev packages at least), so it would certainly be nice to wrap this up and > only have to carry one version of this core library for etch. >

post-sarge transitions: slang

2005-03-16 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Alastair, On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:30:58PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > >* Steve Langasek > > > >| If you are planning any other transitions that will affect a lot of > >| packages, please let us know in advance. We will need to complete the > >| larger transitions as fast as possible