Re: points on future installation disks development

1997-06-14 Thread Tom Lees
On 9 Jun 1997, Sven Rudolph wrote: > My ideas on boot-floppies' future: > > - rewrite dinstall in C - reasons: > - runtime improvements > - don't run fdisk -l that often > - todo: make a libsfdisk from sfdisk > - more complex datastructures (avoid using sed often) > - more compl

Re: points on future installation disks development

1997-06-09 Thread Bruce Perens
Andy Mortimer: > - rewrite dinstall in C: First of all, I want to thank you for your work on "giggle", and on the dialog emulation using "giggle". I think this is just the thing we need for many configuration tasks on Debian. I was thinking of using S-lang for the installation scripts. For the pe

Re: points on future installation disks development

1997-06-09 Thread Sven Rudolph
Andy Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Would be able to provide alternative modules for different purposes > > >(such as a simpler one for a brail interface?), with no recoding. This > > >also makes the provision of an X-based install much more reasonable > > >(although IIR

Re: points on future installation disks development

1997-06-09 Thread Andy Mortimer
On Jun 9, Sven Rudolph wrote > > Andy Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Jun 9, Sven Rudolph wrote > > > > > > My ideas on boot-floppies' future: > > > > > > - rewrite dinstall in C - reasons: [snip] > > > - more complex input masks and consistent user interface [snip] > > Please c

Re: points on future installation disks development

1997-06-09 Thread Sven Rudolph
Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * separate the "install" session from the "configuration" session. > IMHO a system install should be done by asking almost no question (except > HD partitioning, and install media) in 10 minutes. All the configuration > questions should IMHO be ask

Re: points on future installation disks development

1997-06-09 Thread Sven Rudolph
Andy Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [1 ] > On Jun 9, Sven Rudolph wrote > > > > My ideas on boot-floppies' future: > > > > - rewrite dinstall in C - reasons: > > - runtime improvements > > - don't run fdisk -l that often > > - todo: make a libsfdisk from sfdisk > > - mor

Re: points on future installation disks development

1997-06-09 Thread Mark Baker
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just think about it: consider Windows95, OS/2, AIX, MacOS, Linux. > Linux is the only one to ask "what's your DNS IP addr?, etc..." in the middle > of the installation. Possibly because linux is the only one

Re: points on future installation disks development

1997-06-09 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Jun 9, Sven Rudolph wrote > - slang (ncurses shouldn't be needed then, slang is said to have > a curses emulation), or slang's curses emulation is not complete, as far as i can say (i tried to compile some programs with slcurses), and it has no panel/menu/form emulation (the 3 lit

Re: points on future installation disks development

1997-06-09 Thread Vincent Renardias
On 9 Jun 1997, Sven Rudolph wrote: > (Please check whether you answer really belongs to both mailing lists.) > > My ideas on boot-floppies' future: (plenty of good stuff deleted ;) I would add an additional idea: * separate the "install" session from the "configuration" session. IMHO a system

Re: points on future installation disks development

1997-06-09 Thread Bdale Garbee
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: : - new features : - installation via serial terminal An additional reason to do this is that non-PC platforms (Sparc, Alpha, HP coming eventuall...) often run "headless" with onl a serial console and a network interface for servers. Getting it right i

Re: points on future installation disks development

1997-06-08 Thread Andy Mortimer
On Jun 9, Sven Rudolph wrote > > My ideas on boot-floppies' future: > > - rewrite dinstall in C - reasons: > - runtime improvements > - don't run fdisk -l that often > - todo: make a libsfdisk from sfdisk > - more complex datastructures (avoid using sed often) > - more complex i

points on future installation disks development

1997-06-08 Thread Sven Rudolph
(Please check whether you answer really belongs to both mailing lists.) My ideas on boot-floppies' future: - rewrite dinstall in C - reasons: - runtime improvements - don't run fdisk -l that often - todo: make a libsfdisk from sfdisk - more complex datastructures (avoid using sed