Re: piuparts run by every uploader

2009-07-22 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 21. Juli 2009, Jonas Meurer wrote: > is there any chance to get that fixed by either removing the circular > dependency from perl directly or by adding code to manage circular > dependencies to piuparts? as a first approach to this problem I plan to make piuparts ignore circular

Re: piuparts run by every uploader

2009-07-21 Thread Jonas Meurer
Hey, On 21/07/2009 James Vega wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:08:26PM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:11 PM, James Vega wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote: > > >> Better yet, if we could periodically run it on all of the modules in

Re: piuparts run by every uploader

2009-07-21 Thread James Vega
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:08:26PM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote: > Hi James: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:11 PM, James Vega wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote: > >> Better yet, if we could periodically run it on all of the modules in > >> our SVN repository (pkg-p

Re: piuparts and sbuild integration (was: piuparts run by every uploader)

2009-07-21 Thread Roger Leigh
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 05:51:02PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach gregor herrmann [2009.07.21.1736 +0200]: > > But I have to admit that I run it very rarely because it takes way > > too long (including the time to unpack pbuilder's base.tgz). > > Has anyone integrated it with sbuild?

Re: piuparts run by every uploader

2009-07-21 Thread Jonathan Yu
Hi James: On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:11 PM, James Vega wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote: >> Better yet, if we could periodically run it on all of the modules in >> our SVN repository (pkg-perl) and display the logs, then it would give >> us a nice to-do list of

Re: piuparts run by every uploader

2009-07-21 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:44:07 -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote: > > But I have to admit that I run it very rarely because it takes way > > too long (including the time to unpack pbuilder's base.tgz). > In that case, using cowbuilder instead could work, #389223 Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.com

Re: piuparts run by every uploader

2009-07-21 Thread James Vega
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote: > Better yet, if we could periodically run it on all of the modules in > our SVN repository (pkg-perl) and display the logs, then it would give > us a nice to-do list of things to look at. http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/maintainer/p/pkg-

Re: piuparts run by every uploader

2009-07-21 Thread James Westby
Jonathan Yu wrote: > I'd like to see a feature to use cowbuilder's chroot instead, though I > don't know of the technical challenges there. Certainly such a feature > would make it easier to use and thus run more often. That would be useful. It requires adding explicit support in piuparts (with th

piuparts and sbuild integration (was: piuparts run by every uploader)

2009-07-21 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach gregor herrmann [2009.07.21.1736 +0200]: > But I have to admit that I run it very rarely because it takes way > too long (including the time to unpack pbuilder's base.tgz). Has anyone integrated it with sbuild? After all, couldn't it just use the current chroot in which a package was

Re: piuparts run by every uploader

2009-07-21 Thread Jonathan Yu
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:36 AM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:22:07 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > >> Largely due to the need of maintaining a full chroot just for its >> use, I thought piuparts had too high of a barrier of >> entry/maintenance to be used by everyone. Am I comp

Re: piuparts run by every uploader

2009-07-21 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Lars Wirzenius [2009.07.21.1527 +0200]: piuparts is _intended_ to be run by every uploader, actually. Or at least that was my intention back when I wrote it. Okay, that wasn't my impression, sorry for spreading FUD. Largely due to the need of maintaining a

Re: piuparts run by every uploader

2009-07-21 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:22:07 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > Largely due to the need of maintaining a full chroot just for its > use, I thought piuparts had too high of a barrier of > entry/maintenance to be used by everyone. Am I completely wrong? It can use pbuilder's chroot, and pbuilder --cre

Re: piuparts run by every uploader (was: lintian-like tools in teams / early lintian stories)

2009-07-21 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 05:22:07PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Lars Wirzenius [2009.07.21.1527 +0200]: > > piuparts is _intended_ to be run by every uploader, actually. Or > > at least that was my intention back when I wrote it. > > Okay, that wasn't my impression, sorry for sprea

piuparts run by every uploader (was: lintian-like tools in teams / early lintian stories)

2009-07-21 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Lars Wirzenius [2009.07.21.1527 +0200]: > piuparts is _intended_ to be run by every uploader, actually. Or > at least that was my intention back when I wrote it. Okay, that wasn't my impression, sorry for spreading FUD. Largely due to the need of maintaining a full chroot just for it