On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:52:55PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Almost yes, but I thought it sits before autobuilders as below.
> i.e. [upload]→[lintian autoreject]→[piuparts autoreject]→[autobuilders]
we want people to upload source only packages and piuparts and lintian
work on
from
> incoming to unstable after they were built by the autobuilders?
Almost yes, but I thought it sits before autobuilders as below.
i.e. [upload]→[lintian autoreject]→[piuparts autoreject]→[autobuilders]
> This includes stuff like lintian, autopkgtest, piuparts, dose3 or adequate.
Hi,
Quoting Hideki Yamane (2016-11-23 08:24:27)
> Just a question, sometimes some dependency-broken packages would go into
> repository and apt may complain it. Of course, someone would report it and
> maintainers would fix it soon, but 0 dependency-broken packages is best.
>
> Can we integra
Hideki Yamane:
> Hi,
>
> Just a question, sometimes some dependency-broken packages would go into
> repository and apt may complain it. Of course, someone would report it
> and maintainers would fix it soon, but 0 dependency-broken packages is
> best.
>
> Can we integrate piuparts to prevent
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a question, sometimes some dependency-broken packages would go into
> repository and apt may complain it. Of course, someone would report it
> and maintainers would fix it soon, but 0 dependency-broken packages is
> best.
>
>
Hi,
Just a question, sometimes some dependency-broken packages would go into
repository and apt may complain it. Of course, someone would report it
and maintainers would fix it soon, but 0 dependency-broken packages is
best.
Can we integrate piuparts to prevent such situation to build pipeli
6 matches
Mail list logo
