On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> If Priorities aren't going to be updated in a timely manner within
> sid distribution, it might be time to rethink about its usefulness.
Agreed.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness
Hi,
> That said, I think it's good to use --resolve-deps by default for
> testing/unstable, so that override changes aren't that urgent (they don't
> break daily builds etc every other day), and can be batched up a bit, and
> processed when the dependency graph is a bit stable. Which may very well
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:12:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Yes, I don't have --resolve-deps, in the hope that
> > priorities are fixed by ftp-masters.
> >
> > There needs to be a decision somewhere:
> > 1. ignore priorities and go back to what it was before
> > and ma
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:12:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> AFAIK the plan is to not constantly bother the ftp masters with override
> changes,
Which makes the whole packages buggy according to the policy.
Bastian
--
A princess should not be afraid -- not with a brave knight to protect her.
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Yes, I don't have --resolve-deps, in the hope that
> priorities are fixed by ftp-masters.
>
> There needs to be a decision somewhere:
> 1. ignore priorities and go back to what it was before
> and make --resolve-deps the default in debootstrap
> 2. try to fix priorities/s
Hi,
> > debootstrap test:
> > [FAIL] create-sid-debootstrap
> > [FAIL] build-sid-dsh
> > [FAIL] pdebuild-sid-dsh
> > [FAIL] pdebuild-internal-sid-dsh
> > [FAIL] create-etch-debootstrap
> > [FAIL] build-etch-dsh
> > [FAIL] pdebuild-etch-dsh
> > [FAIL] pdebuild-internal-etch-dsh
> > [FAIL] update-et
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> debootstrap test:
> [FAIL] create-sid-debootstrap
> [FAIL] build-sid-dsh
> [FAIL] pdebuild-sid-dsh
> [FAIL] pdebuild-internal-sid-dsh
> [FAIL] create-etch-debootstrap
> [FAIL] build-etch-dsh
> [FAIL] pdebuild-etch-dsh
> [FAIL] pdebuild-internal-etch-dsh
> [FAIL] update-etch-
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:25:23PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> > I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because
> > I own a small modem line, but can download elsewhere.
> > It wasn't able to use this mirror with pbuilder+cdebo
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:25:23PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because
> I own a small modem line, but can download elsewhere.
> It wasn't able to use this mirror with pbuilder+cdebootstrap because
> cdebootstrap will see Release.g
Hi,
> > pbuilder is doing as usual; it's now switched over to
> > cdebootstrap and cdebootstrap has been working fine.
> >
> Not for me.
>
> I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because
> I own a small modem line, but can download elsewhere.
> It wasn't able to use th
Hello Junichi!
Junichi Uekawa Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> pbuilder is doing as usual; it's now switched over to
> cdebootstrap and cdebootstrap has been working fine.
>
Not for me.
I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because
I own a small modem line, but ca
Hi,
pbuilder is doing as usual; it's now switched over to
cdebootstrap and cdebootstrap has been working fine.
However, you do need to use the sid version of pbuilder
and cdebootstrap for things to work.
Also, with changes to 'su'; pbuilder stable backports
to be a requirement.
I've moved ove
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:48:31PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>>Same here. With two sponsors, I doubt you'll have much of a latency trouble
>>>with your uploads :-)
>
>I'm looking for someone to upload the following packages
>
>canna_3.7p3-2_i386.changes: translation updates
>d-shlibs_0.2
Hi,
> > Same here. With two sponsors, I doubt you'll have much of a latency trouble
> > with your uploads :-)
I'm looking for someone to upload the following packages
canna_3.7p3-2_i386.changes: translation updates
d-shlibs_0.26_i386.changes: error checking fix
gamix_1.99.p14.debian1-3_i386.chan
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I'm looking for someone who can upload my jack0.100.0 transition packages;
> care to sponsor?
Uploading right now...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Re
Hi,
Thanks for sponsoring.
> Same here. With two sponsors, I doubt you'll have much of a latency trouble
> with your uploads :-)
I'm looking for someone who can upload my jack0.100.0 transition packages;
care to sponsor?
They are available:
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/tmp/20050820-jacktran
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:46:16AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>>I'm planning on getting a cdebootstrap supported version released somewhat
>>>soonish.
>>>
>>>I'd be looking for sponsored upload, since if I'm not mistaken,
>>>and finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] is telling me the correct thing,
>>
Hi,
> >I'm planning on getting a cdebootstrap supported version released somewhat
> >soonish.
> >
> >I'd be looking for sponsored upload, since if I'm not mistaken,
> >and finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] is telling me the correct thing,
> >my new gpg key is not in the keyring yet.
>
> I'll sponsor all
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> I'll sponsor all your packages.
Same here. With two sponsors, I doubt you'll have much of a latency trouble
with your uploads :-)
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind t
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 08:51:25AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>I'm planning on getting a cdebootstrap supported version released somewhat
>soonish.
>
>I'd be looking for sponsored upload, since if I'm not mistaken,
>and finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] is telling me the correct thing,
>my new gpg key is
Hi,
> pbuilder CVS has a rough support for cdebootstrap;
> it seems to be doing well, today it's not working
> for me; maybe it could do better sometime.
This morning I've tried again, and apparently it's doing something
good.
I'm planning on getting a cdebootstrap supported version released s
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 11:36:47AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>Patch in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314858
>seems to be required; please somebody NMU debootstrap.
Done.
Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
.''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `' http://debian.org/
Hi,
I'm sending an update on how pbuilder/debootstrap is doing right now.
pbuilder CVS has a rough support for cdebootstrap;
it seems to be doing well, today it's not working
for me; maybe it could do better sometime.
Patch in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314858
seems to be
Hi,
Thanks for the comments.
> Ideally there needs to be either
>
> * a login environment where changes are saved AND/OR
>
> * a hook that gets executed for an update operation, *before* apt-get
> is called.
Luckily, since pbuilder 0.118 which was released 31 Oct 2004,
there is a --save-aft
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 11:54:15AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Ideally there needs to be either
>
> * a login environment where changes are saved AND/OR
there is one: use
pbuilder login --save-after-login
(have been confronted with the same problem yesterday...)
--
c u
henning
--
To UNSUBSCR
> "Junichi" == Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Junichi> Hi, I'll just write a mail here to notify people using
Junichi> pbuilder, that sid is a wild place.
I recently had major dramas trying to create a sid chroot from a sarge
system. So perhaps these issues have been fixed
Hi,
I'll just write a mail here to notify people using pbuilder, that
sid is a wild place.
My testsuite tells me that currently Debian sid/etch is not
debootstrap'able. This is due to several problems,
including g++ ABI transition breaking aptitude.
However, the good news is that you should b
27 matches
Mail list logo
