Thomas Hood wrote:
> I am interested in how openresolv stacks up against resolvconf.
...
> What further pros and cons do people see out there?
Mh, having a quick glimpse at openresolv I doubt it is the drop-in
replacement for resolvconf that it suggests to be (Provides/Conflicts:
resolvconf). At
On 30 November 2010 22:57, Thomas Hood wrote:
> An important advantage of openresolv could be that it isn't, like resolvconf,
> undermaintained[1]. If openresolv is truly a drop-in replacement for
> resolvconf then migration from resolvconf to openresolv would be one way of
> solving this unde
I am interested in how openresolv stacks up against resolvconf.
For starters the openresolv home page conveniently compares[0] openresolv with
resolvconf.
> * Works with POSIX shell and userland
Nice. Resolvconf requires bash. But since resolvconf scripts are short, and
bash is Essential in
3 matches
Mail list logo
