On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> My trick to get extra copies of direct replies to my own mails in
> mailing lists (I place such copies into a dedicated folder) is to keep
> a local cache of Message-IDs of my own sent messages and then check
> In-Reply-To: header in the
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:44:07AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 13/03/11 08:19, Ben Finney wrote:
> >Shachar Shemesh writes:
> >>I am subscribed to lots and lots of mailing lists. All mail from those
> >>lists gets automatically delivered to dedicated folders automatically.
> >>This
Hello Carsten Hey,
Am 2011-03-12 10:50:03, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> If a message I reply to contains a Mail-Followup-To: set, I use it. If
> not, I guess if the person I reply to wants to receive a reply. To
> prevent me to Cc: you, you need to explicitly set Mail-Followup-To: to
> the
Hello Shachar Shemesh,
Am 2011-03-13 19:54:01, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> If I set "reply-to" to myself, the mail won't go to the list. If I
> set it to the list, it won't go to me. Either way, the desired
> effect isn't achieved.
>
> Also, reply-to is the wrong tool for this job (this is
On 13/03/11 20:55, Andrei Popescu wrote:
At least with mutt I distinctively recall it replied both to the list
and CCd the poster on list-reply.
That is a specific Mutt work around for broken lists that add "reply-to"
automatically. It is not generally available.
Not sure about other mailers
On Du, 13 mar 11, 19:54:01, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 13/03/11 11:29, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> >>Any suggestions on how to do it?
> >By setting 'Reply-To:' appropriately, this is what it's for.
> If I set "reply-to" to myself, the mail won't go to the list. If I
> set it to the list, it won't
On 13/03/11 11:29, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Any suggestions on how to do it?
By setting 'Reply-To:' appropriately, this is what it's for.
If I set "reply-to" to myself, the mail won't go to the list. If I set
it to the list, it won't go to me. Either way, the desired effect isn't
achi
On Du, 13 mar 11, 10:44:07, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 13/03/11 08:19, Ben Finney wrote:
> >If you like to get two copies, why can't you arrange to generate the
> >extra copies you want without involving anyone else's configuration?
> Any suggestions on how to do it?
By setting 'Reply-To:' appro
Le samedi 12 mars 2011 à 10:50 +0100, Carsten Hey a écrit :
> I set Mail-Followup-To: on every mail I send to *@lists.debian.org.
> Most DDs just ignore it (though there are some exceptions) and this
> renders using Mail-Followup-To: to get a copy to be rather useless.
Maybe this is because Mail-
On 13/03/11 08:19, Ben Finney wrote:
Shachar Shemesh writes:
Personally, I think the code of conduct should be amended, along with
the list software.
While this shouldn't turn into a counting of popularity, I'd like to
register that there are people who think the list behaviour cur
Shachar Shemesh writes:
> Personally, I think the code of conduct should be amended, along with
> the list software.
While this shouldn't turn into a counting of popularity, I'd like to
register that there are people who think the list behaviour currently
(leave the Reply-To field untouched) is
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:57:29PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
[...]
> How should new people know that they don't get a copy of replies
> to their messages unless they explicitly request one?
Maybe it's a generational difference... as I expect did authors of
the code of conduct, I came up on bulleti
* Carsten Hey [2011-03-12 10:50 +0100]:
> There are examples where we lost potential future maintainers because
> they never received a reply to an RFS. These replies were sent to the
> list, but they were not sent to those requesting sponsorship.
To clarify this: the problem was not that Mail-Fo
* jida...@jidanni.org [2011-03-12 11:14 +0800]:
> Recently I replied to a certain message on this list with my familiar
> S W runs the command gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original
> keystrokes, only to receive
>
> >I'm subscribed to the list, no need to CC me:
> >http://www.debian.org/MailingLis
On 12/03/11 05:14, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Therefore perhaps
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
could be amended to mention that adding a Mail-Followup-To header might
add an additional wall of defense for those who wish to cut down even
further the possibility they might recei
Recently I replied to a certain message on this list with my familiar
S W runs the command gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original
keystrokes, only to receive
>I'm subscribed to the list, no need to CC me:
>http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
>No need to reply to this message.
And i
16 matches
Mail list logo
