Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> today I received two bugreports regarding non-free artwork in my
> packages. I maintain several iconsets with thousands of icons. I think
> it is quite impossible to check every single icon whether it is free or not.
>
> Most icons don't contai
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Beware not to be confused between licensing issues and trademark
> ones.
I think perhaps you mean "confused between copyright licensing issues
and trademark licensing ones". Both copyright and trademarks reserve
rights to the holder, who can then gra
Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I make sure that my packages are really clean? Is there a
> best-practice solution for situations like this?
>
> Should artwork be generally considered non-free to avoid violations
> (even when it contains free stuff)?
I think in order to have
On Die, 26 Sep 2006, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> How can I make sure that my packages are really clean? Is there a
> best-practice solution for situations like this?
I recommend the following way:
- as soon as you know of a problem, fix it (new .dfsg orig.tar)
- actively try to check
- otherwise ass
Hi,
today I received two bugreports regarding non-free artwork in my
packages. I maintain several iconsets with thousands of icons. I think
it is quite impossible to check every single icon whether it is free or not.
Most icons don't contain a copyright string, so grepping for certain
keywords is
Le mardi 26 septembre 2006 à 14:57 +0200, Bastian Venthur a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> today I received two bugreports regarding non-free artwork in my
> packages. I maintain several iconsets with thousands of icons. I think
> it is quite impossible to check every single icon whether it is free or not.
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
