>> Jonathan Dowland
> There's no problem coordinating
> virtual packages names if they are all generated by the same source package,
> game-data-packager; furthermore since the packages concerned are not actually
> in Debian, it doesn't seem necessary to document them in Debian policy, IMHO.
Well,
I forgot to add, you should probably post this to the debian-policy list,
either as well or instead of -devel.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.or
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but a) there are no wolf3d data packages in Debian,
even the shareware data is not distributable in non-free, and b) both of the
packages you mention are generated on user demand by game-data-packager. The
point of listing virtual packages in policy is to aid in coordinatin
Hi,
I noticed that the virtual package wolf3d-data had never been added to the
authoritative list; and I would like to fix this.
It has been a de-factor virtual package since 2011:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/wolf4sdl.git/commit/debian/control?id=8aeb2699e544f78049934b37b9d965f5445db
4 matches
Mail list logo
