Okay maybe defining the function in the rules section does solve the
problem. However, this can have the effect of putting bug hunks of C
code in the rules section. This would seem to be bad coding style as
already suggested. It would seem that (at least one of) the uses of the
"user code" sect
>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 12:44:49 -0400,
>> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Flex sets up a number of things that are available in the rules
>> section, and now cleans it all up before polluting the user
>> namespace. Now, actions can be any C statement, but usin
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Joey, I am going to be presumtuous and assume you would not
> mind this response going to a public list; I have condensed your
> questions down to the technical details, and you did imply that you
> considered filing a bug, so the email was not really personal and
Hi,
>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:56:06 -0400,
>> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Joey, I am going to be presumtuous and assume you would not
mind this response going to a public list; I have condensed your
questions down to the technical details, and you did imply that you
considered
4 matches
Mail list logo
