Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-26 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > Yes, if you want mp3-Encoding. > > I see that it links against libvorbis, so perhaps sometime it'll > be possible to use vorbis for soundcompression. > cu andreas Yep - as soon as we will have more programmers in avifile team :) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-25 Thread Christian Marillat
"AM" == Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> But avifile need lame to encode sound no ? > Yes, if you want mp3-Encoding. > I see that it links against libvorbis, so perhaps sometime it'll > be possible to use vorbis for soundcompression. No, vcr only works with lame. Chri

Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-25 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 11:11:58AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > > "EVB" == Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yes. Read legal archive: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200101

Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-25 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > "EVB" == Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200101/msg02634.html, > >> I > >> guess. > > > IIUC, this message refers to using codecs fr

Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "AM" == Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [snip] >> vcr uses avifile, which is not restricted to the win*-codecs anymore, >> but supports/includes libffmpeg (http://ffmpeg.sourceforge.net GPL), >> too. > But avifile need lame to encode

Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-24 Thread Christian Marillat
"AM" == Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:57:05PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: >>> While reading that discussion I do get the impression that >>> OpenDivX is not DFSG compatible. >> >> Yes, And this is why I don't want to include transcode or x2divx

Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:57:05PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: >> While reading that discussion I do get the impression that >> OpenDivX is not DFSG compatible. > > Yes, And this is why I don't want to include transcode or x2divx or > another in Debian. Whitout codecs these packages are unusa

Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-24 Thread Christian Marillat
"GS" == Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> Yes. Read legal archive: >> >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200101/threads.html#00027 > While reading that discussion I do get the impression that OpenDivX is not > DFSG compatible. Yes, And this is why I

Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-24 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > > IIUC, this message refers to using codecs from microsoft.com, while the > > divx4linux library provides equivalent,free codecs. > > > Is this correct ? > > Yes. Read legal archive: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2

Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-24 Thread Christian Marillat
"EVB" == Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200101/msg02634.html, >> I >> guess. > IIUC, this message refers to using codecs from microsoft.com, while the > divx4linux library provides equivalent,free codecs. > I

Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-24 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 12:25:28PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 12:15:43PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > > > Is there any problem keeping them from being included in Debian ? > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200101/msg02634.html, I > guess.

Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-24 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 12:15:43PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > Is there any problem keeping them from being included in Debian ? http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200101/msg02634.html, I guess. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PR

Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-24 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:33:29PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:17:47PM +0200, NORMAND Jacques wrote: > > > I want to pack the divx4linux codec on one hand and the transcode utilities > > on the other. But I never packed libraries and docs aren't that clear with > > that

Re: new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-23 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:17:47PM +0200, NORMAND Jacques wrote: > I want to pack the divx4linux codec on one hand and the transcode utilities > on the other. But I never packed libraries and docs aren't that clear with > that topic. That's why I wan't some clarifications and guidances. > > first

new packages: divx4linux and transcode

2001-09-23 Thread NORMAND Jacques
I am new to package maintaining (even not an official maintainer) and it's my second try. My test was on a local-used distributed.net client. (www.fafa37.com for those want want to take a look). I want to pack the divx4linux codec on one hand and the transcode utilities on the other. But I never p