Re: new mantainer is not working

2000-09-08 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously A Mennucc1 wrote: > what is happening in «new mantainer» ?!? A lot. > look (in http://nm.debian.org ) > at how long the people have been waiting Since nm reopened 150 people have been processed or are being pocessed looking at the stats you mention, I would consider that

new mantainer is not working

2000-09-08 Thread A Mennucc1
hi what is happening in «new mantainer» ?!? look (in http://nm.debian.org ) at how long the people have been waiting --- Count Average Maximum DaysDays Awaiting

Re: new mantainer

1997-06-10 Thread Francesco Tapparo
On Jun 9, Bruce Perens wrote > Please e-mail your request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have not > done so. The folks who approve accounts are there. > > Thanks > > Bruce > -- > Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PROTECTED] 510-215-3502 > Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key. > PGP fi

Re: new mantainer

1997-06-09 Thread Martin Schulze
Francesco Tapparo writes: > Hi, >I'm reading this list from some time, and now I think I'm ready for my > first package; I've read that Martin Schulze is finding a new mantainer for > his xdaliclock package. If Martin agrees, I can take the mantainance of the >

new mantainer

1997-06-09 Thread Francesco Tapparo
Hi, I'm reading this list from some time, and now I think I'm ready for my first package; I've read that Martin Schulze is finding a new mantainer for his xdaliclock package. If Martin agrees, I can take the mantainance of the xdaliclock package. ciao Francesco Tapparo [