Re: netstd split -- pseudo package for upgrades from hamm

1999-01-19 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 11:44:14AM -0800, Ben Gertzfield wrote: > Now if we could only convince the netstd maintainer to make a > pseudo-package for all his splits.. but he has told me he refuses to > support upgrades for anything but dselect. :/ That's disappointing. Why will dselect handle it ei

Re: netstd split -- pseudo package for upgrades from hamm

1999-01-19 Thread Santiago Vila
On 19 Jan 1999, Ben Gertzfield wrote: > > "Brandon" == Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Santiago> I think it is absolutely essential for the success of > Santiago> Debian 2.1 that nobody will automagically lose > Santiago> functionality in the upgrade process. > >

netstd split -- pseudo package for upgrades from hamm

1999-01-19 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "Brandon" == Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Santiago> I think it is absolutely essential for the success of Santiago> Debian 2.1 that nobody will automagically lose Santiago> functionality in the upgrade process. Brandon> Done in experimental changes file: * xb