Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> There are a few bugs open, marked as "help needed" it would be nice if
> anybody would help with those, instead of ranting.
Of course that would be nice, but it's not an answer to my question.
Also, more than two years ago I did write code to solve the IPv4/IPv6
truncatio
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 08:55:46PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Would you be willing to let guus and Olaf co-maintain the package, or
> take it over completely?
There are a few bugs open, marked as "help needed" it would be nice if
anybody would help with those, instead of ranting.
I had multiple
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:52:41PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
>> Hm, looks bad indeed. I'll try to see if Bernd Eckenfels is still alive
>> but if I can't reach him in a week I'll adopt the package.
>
> Sure I am alive.
And... active?
Would you care
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:52:41PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> Hm, looks bad indeed. I'll try to see if Bernd Eckenfels is still alive
> but if I can't reach him in a week I'll adopt the package.
Sure I am alive.
Greetings
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Dec 1, 2007 5:53 PM, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:52:41PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > Hm, looks bad indeed. I'll try to see if Bernd Eckenfels is still alive
> > but if I can't reach him in a week I'll adopt the package.
>
> Sure I am alive.
That's
On Dec 1, 2007 1:48 PM, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The bug count is up to 112.
> > Only two NMU translation uploads have been done in the past two years.
> > No other uploads at all.
>
> Maybe time for a hijack of the package, or at
"Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sorry to ask again, but:
> What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
Looking at the changelog in unstable, pretty much the same as last
time you wrote, aside from the two minor NMUs you mentioned.
> Is there any chance Lenny wil
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:24:58PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> I'm sorry to ask again, but:
> What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
> Is there any chance Lenny will ship with for example working IPv6
> support in netstat?
> I emailed MIA about this, but MIA went MIA itself,
On Aug 2, 2005 6:45 PM, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
> It has 88 bugs:
>
> A lot older than a year, 17 with patch a lot even without a single response.
Hi list,
I'm sorry to ask again, but:
What's the maintenance st
Hi,
On 4/6/07, Martín Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again,
On 4/5/07, Martín Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if I will be able to apply for co-maint, but I started
> working a little on triaging. Hope it helps.
I've spent a lot of hours working on net-tools bugs, 17
On 4/6/07, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 09:32:27AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Well, that's part of the problem, he's basically MIA and doesn't (want
> to) talk about bugs.
thats not true,
You're not basically MIA? How do you explain the lack of uplo
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 09:32:27AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Well, that's part of the problem, he's basically MIA and doesn't (want
> to) talk about bugs.
thats not true, i will discuss about all bugs, especially those which are
tagged help needed. I just dont talk with ppl who dont help m
please make sure to work with the latest cvs version from berlios.
Greetings
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good Work.
Especially to risolve and delete very older bugs. There are more than one
bug opened 4 year ago, for example.
If want to have some help, especially for testing and/or coding, I'm
available.
Happy Easter to anybody all!
Cheers
Cesare
On 4/6/07, Martín Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Hi again,
On 4/5/07, Martín Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know if I will be able to apply for co-maint, but I started
working a little on triaging. Hope it helps.
I've spent a lot of hours working on net-tools bugs, 17 of them if I
don't miss anything. I usertagged them, so if an
On 4/6/07, Martín Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm copying Olaf, since he asked for it in the OP, and Bernd, since
he's the maintainer.
Thanks.
On 4/3/07, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 02:09:00PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > On 8/2/05,
I'm copying Olaf, since he asked for it in the OP, and Bernd, since
he's the maintainer.
On 4/3/07, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 02:09:00PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 8/2/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What's the maintenance
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 02:09:00PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 8/2/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
Are you applying for co-maintenance? If so, you should rather talk the
the package maintainer, I think. Alt
On 8/2/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
It has 88 bugs:
Serious policy violations - outstanding (1 bug)
Important bugs - outstanding (8 bugs)
Normal bugs - outstanding (38 bugs)
Minor bugs - outstanding (9 bugs)
Wishlist
On 3/9/06, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/6/06, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I think you can tell pretty clearly that Bernd has no objection at all
> > to NMU's.
>
> yes, but please not for wishlist bugs. Again:
On 1/6/06, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I think you can tell pretty clearly that Bernd has no objection at all
> > to NMU's.
>
> yes, but please not for wishlist bugs. Again: there are bugs open for
> net-tools where help is requeste
On 1/6/06, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I think you can tell pretty clearly that Bernd has no objection at all
> > to NMU's.
>
> yes, but please not for wishlist bugs. Again: there are bugs open for
> net-tools where help is requeste
Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I think you can tell pretty clearly that Bernd has no objection at all
> to NMU's.
yes, but please not for wishlist bugs. Again: there are bugs open for
net-tools where help is requested, I would love to have patches for those.
Generally I am not awa
On Fri, January 6, 2006 18:25, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> If you look at Bernd's packages overview
>> (http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=ecki) you can see that many of
>
> Which column shows that?
It isn't one specific column, but from the overview and with some clicking
around I can make
On 1/6/06, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, January 6, 2006 17:03, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > Hi Bernd,
> >
> > Could you please respond to this issue?
>
> Hello Olaf,
>
> Could you please stop this? You've been asking about this for many times
I'd prefer to, but that doesn't
On Fri, January 6, 2006 17:03, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
>
> Could you please respond to this issue?
Hello Olaf,
Could you please stop this? You've been asking about this for many times
now and appearently with no result, so it should occur to you that this
stragegy does not work.
If
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 05:03:39PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 12/30/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/22/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 12/16/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 12/16/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL P
On 1/6/06, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 05:03:39PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > On 12/30/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 12/22/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 12/16/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PRO
On 12/30/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/22/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/16/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 12/16/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 08:03:47PM +0100, Olaf va
On 12/22/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/16/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/16/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 08:03:47PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > > > Bernd?
> > >
> > > I dont like the prpos
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 08:03:47PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Bernd?
I dont like the prposed solution, i am looking for a more generic one. The
pressing problem is to display IPV6 netstat on 80char widt correctly without
truncation (#254243).
I guess this will require some changes to the
On 11/29/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/29/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > > And nearly four months later, the package has 92 bugs, 16 with patch
> > > and a lot even without a single
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> And nearly four months later, the package has 92 bugs, 16 with patch
> and a lot even without a single response.
This is not true. Stop bothering me. Most of the patches are not valid.
Please work on the bugs which are tagged as
On 11/29/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > And nearly four months later, the package has 92 bugs, 16 with patch
> > and a lot even without a single response.
>
> This is not true.
What part isn't?
> Stop botheri
On 8/2/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
> It has 88 bugs:
> Serious policy violations - outstanding (1 bug)
> Important bugs - outstanding (8 bugs)
> Normal bugs - outstanding (38 bugs)
> Minor bugs - outstanding (9 b
* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-10 13:51:57 +0100]:
> any chance you could get quoting right? this message is totally
> unreadable.
Came through just fine on my end.
--
mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 11/10/05, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> any chance you could get quoting right? this message is totally
> unreadable.
Maybe it's caused by lack of support for UTF-8?
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 01:48:27PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 10/29/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On 10/25/05, Olaf
> van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > On 10/24/05, Bernd Eckenfels
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:21:04PM +0200,
On 10/29/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/25/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/24/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > > > I'm afraid I have to ask the same questi
On 10/25/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/24/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > > I'm afraid I have to ask the same question again (three months later).
> > > What's the status of this pac
On 10/24/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > I'm afraid I have to ask the same question again (three months later).
> > What's the status of this package in general and my patch in particular?
> > There was some dis
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> I'm afraid I have to ask the same question again (three months later).
> What's the status of this package in general and my patch in particular?
> There was some discussion about it, but nothing really happened.
>
> http://bugs.
On 8/2/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
> It has 88 bugs:
> Serious policy violations - outstanding (1 bug)
> Important bugs - outstanding (8 bugs)
> Normal bugs - outstanding (38 bugs)
> Minor bugs - outstanding (9 b
On 9/9/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Eh, bump, please?
>
> http://net-tools.berlios.de
> Planned: new release 1.65 which contains all the debian patches. Use of some
> netdev features.
Great, but when?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Eh, bump, please?
http://net-tools.berlios.de
Gruss
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/11/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/11/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > > Just one more question: what happened to my original emails?
> >
> > I read them. Most likely I saved the wr
On 8/11/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > Just one more question: what happened to my original emails?
>
> I read them. Most likely I saved the wrong one for further processing. Thats
> why it is a good idea to c
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Just one more question: what happened to my original emails?
I read them. Most likely I saved the wrong one for further processing. Thats
why it is a good idea to copy the bug report. Sorry for your double work.
Gruss
Bernd
--
Bump.
On 8/6/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Didn't I (also) send you a much later version?
>
> Hmm.. I cant find that, but yes I thin u did. Can you dig that up?
Sure: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=222324&msg=19
J
On 8/6/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Didn't I (also) send you a much later version?
>
> Hmm.. I cant find that, but yes I thin u did. Can you dig that up?
Sure: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=222324&msg=19
Just on
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Didn't I (also) send you a much later version?
Hmm.. I cant find that, but yes I thin u did. Can you dig that up?
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/5/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >> I have attached it to the bug.
> > Thanks. But: It's not ready yet, but what do you think of it?
>
> It is not ready yet :)
Didn't I (also) send you a much later version?
> No seriously I thin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> I have attached it to the bug.
> Thanks. But: It's not ready yet, but what do you think of it?
It is not ready yet :)
No seriously I think the idea with having the column width in *_width is
fine. I would add a calculation of it based on COLUMS if and
On 8/5/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Yes, it's about that bug.
>
> I have attached it to the bug.
Thanks. But: It's not ready yet, but what do you think of it?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Yes, it's about that bug.
I have attached it to the bug.
Greetings
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/5/05, Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, August 05, 2005 3:42 PM, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On 8/2/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 07:45:12PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> >>> What's the maintenanc
On Friday, August 05, 2005 3:42 PM, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 8/2/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 07:45:12PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>> What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
>>
>> It is maintained. Patches
On 8/2/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 07:45:12PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
>
> It is maintained. Patches are welcome.
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/net-tools.html
>
> Which patch are
On 8/2/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 07:45:12PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
>
> It is maintained. Patches are welcome.
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/net-tools.html
>
> Which patch are
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 07:45:12PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
It is maintained. Patches are welcome.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/net-tools.html
Which patch are you talking about?
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
It has 88 bugs:
Serious policy violations - outstanding (1 bug)
Important bugs - outstanding (8 bugs)
Normal bugs - outstanding (38 bugs)
Minor bugs - outstanding (9 bugs)
Wishlist items - outstanding (32 bugs)
A lot older than a ye
61 matches
Mail list logo
