Re: neat mutt bug.

2001-09-19 Thread Niklas Hoglund
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:42:04PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > > > > Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person > > into thinking Branden actually signed this. > > except for that long pause

Re: neat mutt bug.

2001-09-17 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 05:06:33PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:42:04PM -0700, "John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > I had to watch closely to notice the lack of a GPG verification on it.. As long as you don't miss the 's' in the tagline.

Re: neat mutt bug.

2001-09-17 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:42:04PM -0700, "John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > > > > Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person > > into thinking Branden actually signed thi

Re: neat mutt bug.

2001-09-17 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > > Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person > into thinking Branden actually signed this. except for that long pause for the signature checking itself that was conspicously missing. -john

Re: neat mutt bug.

2001-09-17 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Sep 16 03:12:37 2001) --] > gpg: Signature made Thu Sep 13 20:30:20 2001 PDT using DSA key ID 2B46A27C > gpg: Good signature from "Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > gpg: a

Re: neat mutt bug.

2001-09-16 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Aaron Lehmann wrote: > Where? Euh, the manual I guess? I know I read it somewhere. Wichert. -- _ / Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lia

Re: neat mutt bug.

2001-09-16 Thread Aaron Lehmann
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > That's documented Where?

Re: neat mutt bug.

2001-09-16 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Adam McKenna wrote: > Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person > into thinking Branden actually signed this. That's documented, nothing special about it. Wichert. -- _ / Nothi

Re: neat mutt bug.

2001-09-16 Thread Adam McKenna
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 12:34:22PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote: > also sprach Adam McKenna (on Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:17:37AM -0700): > > Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person > > into thinking Branden actually signed this. > > oooh. this is ugly. reported it t

Re: neat mutt bug.

2001-09-16 Thread Martin F Krafft
also sprach Adam McKenna (on Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:17:37AM -0700): > Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person > into thinking Branden actually signed this. oooh. this is ugly. reported it to bugtraq? if not bugtraq, then at least michael elkins should know... mar

neat mutt bug.

2001-09-16 Thread Adam McKenna
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Sep 16 03:12:37 2001) --] gpg: Signature made Thu Sep 13 20:30:20 2001 PDT using DSA key ID 2B46A27C gpg: Good signature from "Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" gpg: aka "Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" gpg: Fingerprint: 1573 D544