On 2011-04-30, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> Why not? Or - what is the blocker? (If there is some easily removable,
>> I'm happy to remove it.)
> Currently, if you upload something to unstable, well, you end up with it
> in unstable... I don't want that for mozilla.d.n packa
1 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > > * Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 12:16]:
> > > > > > That being said, it would be really helpful to be able to get
> > > > > > buildds
> > > > > > to build the mozilla.d
..@glandium.org) [110430 12:16]:
> > > > > That being said, it would be really helpful to be able to get buildds
> > > > > to build the mozilla.d.n packages...
> > > >
> > > > Would it work to build the packages in unstable? If so, why not
> >
would be really helpful to be able to get buildds
> > > > to build the mozilla.d.n packages...
> > >
> > > Would it work to build the packages in unstable? If so, why not
> > > uploading them to experimental and re-branding them in mozilla.d.n?
> >
>
* Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 13:28]:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 12:16]:
> > > That being said, it would be really helpful to be able to get buildds
> > > to bui
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 12:16]:
> > That being said, it would be really helpful to be able to get buildds
> > to build the mozilla.d.n packages...
>
> Would it work to build the packages in uns
* Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 12:16]:
> That being said, it would be really helpful to be able to get buildds
> to build the mozilla.d.n packages...
Would it work to build the packages in unstable? If so, why not
uploading them to experimental and re-branding them in mozil
7 matches
Mail list logo
