Ce jour Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Andreas Barth a dit:
> Dear all,
>
> I uploaded the current version of iproute (that also works with current
> 2.6-kernels) to experimental. As this is a major change, any test
> reports are appreciated. Also, a review of the source whether I managed
> to keep all securi
* Milan P. Stanic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041110 12:35]:
> Why version is iproute_20041019 while the upstream is
> iproute2-2.6.9-041019? Upstream version is 2.6.9 actually. Date is
> appended to serve as timestamp, I think.
Because changing the version format would be a bad think in a NMU.
Cheers,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 11:18:46AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I uploaded the current version of iproute (that also works with current
> 2.6-kernels) to experimental. As this is a major change, any test
> reports are appreciated. Also, a review of the source whether I managed
> to keep all securi
Dear all,
I uploaded the current version of iproute (that also works with current
2.6-kernels) to experimental. As this is a major change, any test
reports are appreciated. Also, a review of the source whether I managed
to keep all security patches might be a good idea (I'm quite confident
that I
4 matches
Mail list logo
