On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 07:59:44PM +, Frank Küster wrote:
> We have a similar problem with TeX documentation. In my opinion, using menu
> categories for doc-base might have been a good start, but we should definitely
> extend that now.
>
> I'm currently in semi-VAC mode and don't have time to
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 07:59:44PM +, Frank Küster wrote:
> We have a similar problem with TeX documentation. In my opinion,
> using menu categories for doc-base might have been a good start, but
> we should definitely extend that now.
Perhaps we should piggyback on the debtags work and have
Stefano Zacchiroli debian.org> writes:
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:19:43PM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> > The Debian OCaml maintenance team is looking at how to organize the
> > HTML documentation provided by the various OCaml packages. Our first
>
> Right, to add some details to that:
> - e
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:19:43PM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> The Debian OCaml maintenance team is looking at how to organize the
> HTML documentation provided by the various OCaml packages. Our first
Right, to add some details to that:
- each library we have (will) ship an HTML documentation of
The Debian OCaml maintenance team is looking at how to organize the
HTML documentation provided by the various OCaml packages. Our first
thought was to use doc-base, but according to the doc-base
documentation, the hierarchy is determined by the Debian menu
sub-policy (http://www.debian.org/doc/pa
5 matches
Mail list logo
