Re: mdadm+udev needs testing!

On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 11:47:07AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Andreas Gredler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.22.1052 +0200]: > > brw-rw 1 root disk 9, 2 May 22 10:31 /dev/md2 > > brw-r--r-- 1 root root 9, 20 May 22 10:31 /dev/md20 > > > > I'm not sure why some devices are g

Re: mdadm+udev needs testing!

also sprach Andreas Gredler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.22.1052 +0200]: > Now I was able to create my RAID without the -auto=yes option. Good. > brw-rw 1 root disk 9, 2 May 22 10:31 /dev/md2 > brw-r--r-- 1 root root 9, 20 May 22 10:31 /dev/md20 > > I'm not sure why some devices are group

Re: mdadm+udev needs testing!

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 05:51:44PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > [Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > mdadm has three udev-related RC bugs (#294404, #273182 and #301560), > which I seem to have been able to fix using previous work by Steve > Langasek and Marco d'Itri. Since mdadm is a critical piece of >

mdadm+udev needs testing!

[Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mdadm has three udev-related RC bugs (#294404, #273182 and #301560), which I seem to have been able to fix using previous work by Steve Langasek and Marco d'Itri. Since mdadm is a critical piece of software, I herewith call to those of you with the ability to test it in a u