On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 8:51 AM Alastair McKinstry <
alastair.mckins...@sceal.ie> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is Qt6-base not in testing, for bookworm? I've an app (metview) that I
> switched over Qt5->Qt6, should I move it back?
>
>
Bookworm currently has Qt 6.3.1 and 6.4.0 packaged.
> regards
>
> Alasta
Hi,
Is Qt6-base not in testing, for bookworm? I've an app (metview) that I
switched over Qt5->Qt6, should I move it back?
regards
Alastair
On 13/12/2022 20:27, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:
Well qt5 is fine too. I don't need fancy features. I will make a kde app.
On 13.12.22 05:22, Imre Nagy
Greetings,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 09:27:34PM +0100, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:
Well qt5 is fine too. I don't need fancy features. I will make a kde app.
On 13.12.22 05:22, Imre Nagy wrote:
The downside of these things, that current Debian does not seem to
include Qt6 at all and I have no idea
Well qt5 is fine too. I don't need fancy features. I will make a kde app.
On 13.12.22 05:22, Imre Nagy wrote:
The downside of these things, that current Debian does not seem to
include Qt6 at all and I have no idea when it can go into the
mainstream Debian, while there are a lot of project coul
I call it websearch++. It is basically an app for searching the web like
google or duckduckgo but with additional features. Those features are
for example: You can assign information (useful, less useful, garbage
for example) to web search result links or whole domains (useful for
blacklisting)
Hi Timothy,
I understand that, but 2 years from now Qt would be around 6.8-6.9 ...
possible Qt7?
So I start to have doubt that Debian could ever catch up.
Although you are right, that _I_ can install Qt6 from sources, but I
cannot expect that from all my users. They just want to use it.
So I
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 12:51 AM Imre Nagy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What do we think about "accessibility" in this thread? The MSAA like
> helping for visually challenged, or the global avaiblity (and
> acceptance) of QT?
>
> As of Qt 5.15, (and Qt 6.4.x lately) you do not have to make the hard
> choice
Hi,
What do we think about "accessibility" in this thread? The MSAA like
helping for visually challenged, or the global avaiblity (and
acceptance) of QT?
As of Qt 5.15, (and Qt 6.4.x lately) you do not have to make the hard
choice between responsive webpage or desktop application, since you
On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 18:01 +0100, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:
> I wan't a highly interactive web app, A desktop app is also possible.
What program are you intending to develop?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
>I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will use qt.
>Thanks for your time.
QT accessibility has improved a lot, but I suspect that a single page
web app with vuejs and a good widget set on top of that is going to be
more accessible than a QT app even today.
I find I stumble
I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will use qt.
Thanks for your time.
Regards, Andy
On 12.12.22 18:01, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:
I think static site generators as well as indie web technology is more
about websites and social networking, but I wan't a highly interactive
I think static site generators as well as indie web technology is more
about websites and social networking, but I wan't a highly interactive
web app, preferable a single page application. Is there no javascript
spa framework/lib with a full featured ui library for debian? Vuejs is
packaged for
Quoting Paul Wise (2022-12-10 03:51:20)
> On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 13:12 +0100, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:
>
> > I'd like to develop a free software web app and I wanne be the debian
> > maintainer for it. It should be fully integrated to debian und freedombox.
> >
> > What web technology should I us
On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 13:12 +0100, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:
> I'd like to develop a free software web app and I wanne be the debian
> maintainer for it. It should be fully integrated to debian und freedombox.
>
> What web technology should I use?
Personally I would suggest to focus on static si
Hi,
Le ven. 9 déc. 2022 à 13:13, Andreas Josef Heil a
écrit :
>
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to develop a free software web app and I wanne be the debian
> maintainer for it. It should be fully integrated to debian und freedombox.
>
> What web technology should I use? My first choice is
> vuejs/vuetify/ex
Hi!
I'd like to develop a free software web app and I wanne be the debian
maintainer for it. It should be fully integrated to debian und freedombox.
What web technology should I use? My first choice is
vuejs/vuetify/express/typeorm, but vuetify and typeorm are not packaged
for debian. Is it
16 matches
Mail list logo
