Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben:
>Well. I have reported "through the button" in the past months spam for three
>different mailing lists (debian-doc, debian-l10n-spanish, and
>debian-devel-spanish) and I *still* see the reported spam there [1]. So I'm a
>little bit skep
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 05:44:51AM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote:
> The button is good for pointing out where we should remove something.
Well. I have reported "through the button" in the past months spam for three
different mailing lists (debian-doc, debian-l10n-spanish, and
debian-devel-spanish) a
Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben:
>Well, I thought it would be useful to
>
>a) have spam mails from the mailing list archive
>b) enhance the filters
for that we have the 'report as spam'-Button. We also use that input
for the filters, but mainly, the damage is done in
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:33:04AM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote:
> it's not ok to bounce us spam from years ago, this address is another
> feedback-loop to enhace our filters, it's useless to get old[1] spam
> there.
Well, I thought it would be useful to
a) have spam mails from the mailing list a
Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben:
>I've just bounced all the spam from Debian mailing lists that got through my
>(local and ISP's) filters and I had stored in a separate folder to that
>address. They are 33, hopefully it will not get me blacklisted.
>
>Is it OK if we, mu
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:47:41 +0100]:
>
> > Is it OK if we, mutt users, use this?
>
> Why not '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'? ('b' does (B)ounce
> in the default keybindings). THat's what Cord asked for...
Ou
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:47:41 +0100]:
> Is it OK if we, mutt users, use this?
Why not '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'? ('b' does (B)ounce
in the default keybindings). THat's what Cord asked for...
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 07:03:31AM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote:
>
> If you get spam via our lists, BOUNCE[1] it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The advantage of posting it here is that it can be used as a measure of how
much spam does posting to a debian mailing attracts, spammers will probably
send some
Hallo! Du (Amaya) hast geschrieben:
>Cord Beermann wrote:
>> Also we (the listmasters) don't train the bayes-filter,
>
>May I ask why?
You may. ;-)
I looked into this and found that we automagically train the bayes
with the spam we get, but we don't train in the ham.
Another thing for the ever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/24/2006 10:03 AM, Cord Beermann wrote:
[...]
> [1] Bounce as in mutt b. I don't know if and how this can be done in
> thunderbird, or M$ LookOut. If it possible someone may explain
> it in a follow up. Forwarding is NOT ok at this tim
Hi Cord!
First of all, thanks for the listamster work involving spam.
Cord Beermann wrote:
> Also we (the listmasters) don't train the bayes-filter,
May I ask why?
> we add also rules to procmail and SpamAssassin if nessecary.
That's great, thanks.
--
.''`. I may not have gone where I in
Hallo! Du (Blars Blarson) hast geschrieben:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>on 2: we would need a whole spam-mail including all headers so we can
>> find charakteristika to filter on, so i now take all nominated
>> postings, and try to find patterns with some
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>on 2: we would need a whole spam-mail including all headers so we can
> find charakteristika to filter on, so i now take all nominated
> postings, and try to find patterns with some black
> shell-magic.
Is "sa-learn --spam
Hi,
* Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-24 14:31]:
> Hallo! Du (Cord Beermann) hast geschrieben:
>
> >The idea of having a reporting address is good, i'll will announce one
> >in the next days and then lets see what happens.
>
> ok, here it is: (alpha release, lets see what happens and i
Hallo! Du (Cord Beermann) hast geschrieben:
>The idea of having a reporting address is good, i'll will announce one
>in the next days and then lets see what happens.
ok, here it is: (alpha release, lets see what happens and if it is
useful.)
If you get spam via our lists, BOUNCE[1] it to
[EMAIL
Hallo! Du (Nico Golde) hast geschrieben:
>At the moment the spam-report.pl script uses:
>
>
>
>To identify the message, this wouldn't work with a MUA so the idea came
>to my mind was to identify the Mail with the message-ID.
>Paskal Hakim asked what happens if someone fakes the message-ID in the
16 matches
Mail list logo
