Re: list of bashisms

1997-05-19 Thread Raul Miller
Andy Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > There has just been a long list of bugs against packages using `bashisms' > > in their scripts, and I can certainly remember this issue coming up > > before. But I don't know about anyone else, but I certainly have no idea > > what features are availabl

Re: list of bashisms

1997-05-19 Thread CD Rasmussen
I would imagine that the sensible approach would be to script only with features found in both ash and bash. This would also make you ksh safe if someone were to propigate the susV stupidity of installing ksh as sh. Costa From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Baker) Subject: Re: list of bashisms

Re: list of bashisms

1997-05-19 Thread Mark Baker
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There has just been a long list of bugs against packages using `bashisms' > in their scripts, and I can certainly remember this issue coming up > before. But I don't know about anyone else, but I certainly have no

Re: list of bashisms

1997-05-18 Thread Herbert Xu
Andy Mortimer wrote: > There has just been a long list of bugs against packages using `bashisms' > in their scripts, and I can certainly remember this issue coming up > before. But I don't know about anyone else, but I certainly have no idea > what features are available in the `original sh'. I us

list of bashisms

1997-05-18 Thread Andy Mortimer
There has just been a long list of bugs against packages using `bashisms' in their scripts, and I can certainly remember this issue coming up before. But I don't know about anyone else, but I certainly have no idea what features are available in the `original sh'. Is there a list somewhere, which