Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-12 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: > > > On 12/02/17 13:47, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Hi, thanks for thoughts! > > >> /lib/udev/??-mm-*.rules are probably of interest. ModemManager >> implements a whitelist (devices that are definitely modems), a blacklist >> (devices that are def

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-12 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 11:33:22 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: >> On 12/02/17 11:16, Bastien Roucaries wrote: >> > Last time braille stuff break (brick) a FPGA device with a jtag adaptator >> > (serial to jtag). So i really dislike package that

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-12 Thread Alec Leamas
On 12/02/17 13:47, Simon McVittie wrote: Hi, thanks for thoughts! /lib/udev/??-mm-*.rules are probably of interest. ModemManager implements a whitelist (devices that are definitely modems), a blacklist (devices that are definitely not modems), and a greylist (devices that might be modems, bu

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-12 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 11:33:22 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: > On 12/02/17 11:16, Bastien Roucaries wrote: > > Last time braille stuff break (brick) a FPGA device with a jtag adaptator > > (serial to jtag). So i really dislike package that bind to all char device. > > > > Btw if you do this you need

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-12 Thread Alec Leamas
On 12/02/17 11:16, Bastien Roucaries wrote: Last time braille stuff break (brick) a FPGA device with a jtag adaptator (serial to jtag). So i really dislike package that bind to all char device. > > Btw if you do this you need a break on braille stuff... Now, we are not talking about all

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-12 Thread Bastien Roucaries
Le 11 février 2017 11:46:14 GMT+01:00, Alec Leamas a écrit : > > >On 11/02/17 10:29, Bastien Roucaries wrote: >> Le 10 février 2017 16:13:15 GMT+01:00, Alec Leamas > a écrit : >>> Dear list, >[cut] >>> Proposed /dev/ permissions after installing lirc: >>> >>> - The /dev/lirc? devices are set us

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-11 Thread Alec Leamas
On 11/02/17 10:29, Bastien Roucaries wrote: Le 10 février 2017 16:13:15 GMT+01:00, Alec Leamas a écrit : Dear list, [cut] Proposed /dev/ permissions after installing lirc: - The /dev/lirc? devices are set user:group lirc:lirc and mode 660 (udev rule). - The lirc user is added to the inpu

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-11 Thread Bastien Roucaries
Le 10 février 2017 16:13:15 GMT+01:00, Alec Leamas a écrit : >Dear list, > >After some work it seems that an updated LIRC package has landed in >stretch without any major problems. This resolves the urgent need to >update it to something recent enough to be supported by upstream. > >One remai

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-10 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: > Thoughts? Your post reminds me of the uaccess and AppStream items here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/11/msg8.html -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-10 Thread Alec Leamas
Dear list, After some work it seems that an updated LIRC package has landed in stretch without any major problems. This resolves the urgent need to update it to something recent enough to be supported by upstream. One remaining problem is that lircd, the main LIRC daemon, runs as root. This