On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 02:23:26PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> It looks like providing .la and pkg-config files to explain how to build
> it statically
> looks like necessary. newt doesn't ordinarily use libtool, so I need to
> generate a .la
> file and include it in the libnewt-dev. Current
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>
>
>> On Dec 14, Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> So where do people think the bug lies?
>>> - Should libdl be compiled into libnewt.a ?
>>>
>> Yes.
>>
>
> Is there even a libdl.a?
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Dec 14, Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So where do people think the bug lies?
>> - Should libdl be compiled into libnewt.a ?
> Yes.
Is there even a libdl.a?
And what if I have libfoo.a libbar.a libblub.a all using dlopen?
Should
Le jeudi 14 décembre 2006 à 11:56 +, Alastair McKinstry a écrit :
> partimage depends on libnewt, which I maintain. libnewt-dev ships libnewt.a.
> libnewt opportunistically links to libfribidi if it is present; it uses
> dlopen() to do so.
>
> However the partimage build fails when done with '
On Dec 14, Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So where do people think the bug lies?
> - Should libdl be compiled into libnewt.a ?
Yes.
> - Should the static version of libnewt be built differently so as to
> not call dlopen()?
Maybe.
> - if so, any recommendations on how?
Rem
Hi,
I've an interesting bug scenario sent to me by someone trying to build
partimage statically.
The partimage build is being done to make a small minimal-environment
binary (sort of boot-cd, etc.).
partimage depends on libnewt, which I maintain. libnewt-dev ships libnewt.a.
libnewt opportunistic
On Mon, Apr 13, 1998 at 09:32:12AM -0400, Alex Yukhimets wrote:
> I also had a very similar problem with -lXt, the only difference is that I
> used altgcc for compilation. Btw, what is the prefered way to use it?
I don't think there's just one right way to use it. Personally, I'd try
something li
> > if i replace -lXpm by /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 the program links
> > fine. does anybody have any idea what's going on here?
>
> "ld" only looks for libXpm.so, not for libXpm.so.version. In Debian,
> libfoo.so is part of the libfoo-dev package, not of the libfoo package, as
> you need the hea
On Sun, Apr 12, 1998 at 11:07:02PM -0500, Alex Romosan wrote:
> and the error:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot open -lXpm: No such file or directory
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> but the library exists:
>
> ls -l /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4*
>0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1
i've run into a really strange problem, and i can't seem to figure it
out. i am attempting to link a program against Xpm and the linker
tells me it can't find it. this is the command:
g77 evtdsp_main.o xencode.o ../e815_analysis/dst/ftio.o getolevent.o \
getoesevent.o getofsevent.o sigonline.
10 matches
Mail list logo