Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-07 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Hamish" == Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hamish> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:53:29PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: >> The latest package is supposed to ask you whether you want to generate a >> new >> lilo.conf or keep the manual

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-07 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:17:20AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote: > On 01-01-06 Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > mizar:[~/src/linux/2.4.0/linux] egrep 'VERSION|LEVEL' Makefile | head -3 > > VERSION = 2 > > PATCHLEVEL = 4 > > SUBLEVEL = 0 > > mizar:[~/src/linux/2.4.0/linux] grep -B 1 ^CONFIG_DEVFS_FS > >

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-07 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:53:29PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > The latest package is supposed to ask you whether you want to generate a new > lilo.conf or keep the manually created one (default keep the manual one). If If you already have a /etc/lilo.conf, why ask anything at all?

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-07 Thread Christian Kurz
On 01-01-06 Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:40:53PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote: > > On 01-01-06 Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:58:48PM +0100, Cosimo Alfarano wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote: > > > > > Don't ass

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-07 Thread Russell Coker
On Saturday 06 January 2001 23:04, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I am working on the Debian package of lilo and am writing code for > > auto-generating lilo.conf files. > > Presumably, if there is a /etc/lilo.conf file already on the sys

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-07 Thread Russell Coker
On Saturday 06 January 2001 23:33, Peter Makholm wrote: > Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > boot=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc > > root=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3 > > Don't assume devfs! A lot of us uses it, but before our standard > kernel uses it our lilo package s

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-07 Thread Russell Coker
On Sunday 07 January 2001 05:50, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > >>"Russell" == Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Russell> other=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 > Russell> label=part1 > Russell> table=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc > > Eh? I have an SCSI

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-06 Thread Peter Eckersley
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 04:12:54AM +0100, Mathias Gygax wrote: > On Sam, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:52:17 +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > > I'll try and make the next version do what you > > require. > > well it's not necessary, but what about a boot message like: > > > __

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-06 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Russell" == Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Russell> other=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 Russell> label=part1 Russell> table=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc Eh? I have an SCSI only machine which does not do devfs. Does the postinst handle that?

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-06 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:40:53PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote: > On 01-01-06 Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:58:48PM +0100, Cosimo Alfarano wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote: > > > > Don't assume devfs! A lot of us uses it, but before

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-06 Thread Christian Kurz
On 01-01-06 Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:58:48PM +0100, Cosimo Alfarano wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote: > > > Don't assume devfs! A lot of us uses it, but before our standard > > > kernel uses it our lilo package shouldn't assume it un

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-06 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:58:48PM +0100, Cosimo Alfarano wrote: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote: > > Don't assume devfs! A lot of us uses it, but before our standard > > kernel uses it our lilo package shouldn't assume it unless it is very > > sure that it will wor

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 06:06:47AM -0600, Gordon Sadler wrote: > Just FYI, as of now, the package available in sid/unstable does NOT ask > to save your /etc/lilo.conf. If you install the current deb backup your > lilo.conf file first. If you've done the upgrade already note that i

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-06 Thread Cosimo Alfarano
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote: > Don't assume devfs! A lot of us uses it, but before our standard > kernel uses it our lilo package shouldn't assume it unless it is very > sure that it will work. He shouldn't assume it even if debian standard kernel package uses it.

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-06 Thread Peter Makholm
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > boot=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc > root=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3 Don't assume devfs! A lot of us uses it, but before our standard kernel uses it our lilo package shouldn't assume it unless it is very sure that it will work.

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-06 Thread Gordon Sadler
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:04:52PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I am working on the Debian package of lilo and am writing code for > > auto-generating lilo.conf files. > > Presumably, if there is a /etc/lilo.conf file already on

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-05 Thread Mathias Gygax
On Sam, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:52:17 +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > I'll try and make the next version do what you > require. well it's not necessary, but what about a boot message like: _-_ _-- __ _ ___-

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-05 Thread Luca Filipozzi
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:52:17PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > I am working on the Debian package of lilo and am writing code for > auto-generating lilo.conf files. > image=/vmlinuz.old > label=old the 'old' image should be optional... i.e., add the optional keyword

lilo.conf

2001-01-05 Thread Russell Coker
I am working on the Debian package of lilo and am writing code for auto-generating lilo.conf files. Below is an example of the type of lilo.conf that can be generated. The debconf asks whether you want boot or boot-menu as the boot loader, it asks what VGA mode you want, what parameters to