On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:00:44PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > But since you asked, the libpng transition is waiting for the readiness of
> > a
> > large cluster of GNOME 1 packages culminating in gnucash
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But since you asked, the libpng transition is waiting for the readiness of a
> large cluster of GNOME 1 packages culminating in gnucash, and will probably
> go in as soon as gnucash is ready.
gnucash is number *27* on the sparc bui
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 01:13:30AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > I wonder, when latest wxwindows2.4 packages will be moved to testing.
>
> As soon as subversion and rapidsvn are fixed and subversion gets into testing.
> Currently wxwindows2.4 is held up only because the new version breaks th
are more users who would be hurt by
removing rapidsvn from testing than are hurt by waiting for new
wxwindows2.4). Feel free to convince them otherwise.
> I know that a libpng transition is happening currently and I assume
> that there is some manual intervention necessary. So I guess
t;
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=libpng
>
> I know that a libpng transition is happening currently and I assume
> that there is some manual intervention necessary. So I guess I missed
> some piece of information here. Yould somebody please enlighten me
> about
libpng transition is happening currently and I assume
that there is some manual intervention necessary. So I guess I missed
some piece of information here. Yould somebody please enlighten me
about the planned time scale of the libpng tranistion?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 10:32:22AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jan 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:27:00PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > Another way is to bump the soname on libL at the time you bump the one
> > > on libM. People are
what about making a package called "libpng-inconsistency", which
versioned-conflicts with those packages not yet recompiled;
libqt, libgd, imlib etc. then only have to depend on this one package,
so the conflicts list of them doesn't get too big ;)
This would allow us to delay the upgrade of libqt
On Fri, 04 Jan 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:27:00PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Another way is to bump the soname on libL at the time you bump the one
> > on libM. People are usually against this, since in fact the libL
> > interface hasn't changed at all. I'
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:27:00PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If we go this route, how do we gracefully handle a bump in
> > SONAME for libM?
> We have no way. We have an ungraceful way, however: create a flag
> day, when all the relev
"Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If we go this route, how do we gracefully handle a bump in
> SONAME for libM?
We have no way. We have an ungraceful way, however: create a flag
day, when all the relevant applications need to be recompiled.
Another way is to bump the soname on
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 05:48:53PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2002, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > and have created one (See 127215). From my perspective the problem
> > seems to be the libpng3 changes the dependencies of qt2 and hense kde.
> > It seems the fix is not to r
12 matches
Mail list logo
