Re: libnode *might* need abi bump related to openssl 1.1.1 api break... or not...

2019-02-20 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le lun. 18 févr. 2019 à 21:16, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior a écrit : > On 2019-02-18 11:08:30 [+0100], Jérémy Lal wrote: > > hi ! > Hi, > > > It happens that that api breakage has been reverted and is merged in > > openssl 1.1.1 stable branch: > > > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/37857e9

Re: libnode *might* need abi bump related to openssl 1.1.1 api break... or not...

2019-02-18 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2019-02-18 11:08:30 [+0100], Jérémy Lal wrote: > hi ! Hi, > It happens that that api breakage has been reverted and is merged in > openssl 1.1.1 stable branch: > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/37857e9b5258da148e5d3699b6acdf8787417eb2 > > If openssl releases this and the release goes

libnode *might* need abi bump related to openssl 1.1.1 api break... or not...

2019-02-18 Thread Jérémy Lal
hi ! Nodejs c++ addons (modules) in buster are built using libnode-dev - a great improvement over previous "situation". However upstream libnode embeds its dependencies, whereas almost all debian libnode dependencies are shared. Modules authors expect a given node ABI to offer the same versions, o