Re: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED [and 2 more messages]

2016-08-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 09/08/16 19:40, Ian Jackson wrote: > Do we _usually_ have files in .debs which are *derived from* (not just > generated by) files from other packages, whose authorship is not > represented in the resulting .deb ? > > (I think it is fair to disregard things like libgcc, whose authors > have expl

Re: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED [and 2 more messages]

2016-08-09 Thread Ian Jackson
Andreas Tille writes ("Re: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED [and 2 more messages]"): > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:33:16PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > 7 (lack of authorship and copright info in .deb for a file contained > > in the .deb) is a release-critica

Re: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED [and 2 more messages]

2016-08-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ian, On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:33:16PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Andreas Tille writes ("Re: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED [and > 2 more messages]"): > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:30:39PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Are you really saying t

Re: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED [and 2 more messages]

2016-08-09 Thread Ian Jackson
Andreas Tille writes ("Re: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED [and 2 more messages]"): > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:30:39PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Are you really saying that it is not necessary for the .deb to contain > > the authorship and copyright no

Re: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED [and 2 more messages]

2016-08-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:30:39PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I don't think you should. I believe Thorsten is overreaching in asking > > you to do that. > > Are you really saying that it is not necessary for the .deb to contain > the authorship and copyright notices for the contents of the pac

Re: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED [and 2 more messages]

2016-08-09 Thread Ian Jackson
Julien Cristau writes ("Re: How to specify files not in source package in d/copyright (Was: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)"): > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 23:37:03 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > The jquery.js is installed by doxygen in the documentation proces

Re: How to specify files not in source package in d/copyright (Was: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2016-08-07 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 11:37:03PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 05:00:09PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > as you somehow add jquery.js to your doc-package, please add its license > > to your debian/copyright. > > The jquery.js is installed by doxygen in the documenta

Re: How to specify files not in source package in d/copyright (Was: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2016-08-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 23:37:03 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 05:00:09PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > as you somehow add jquery.js to your doc-package, please add its license > > to your debian/copyright. > > The jquery.js is installed by doxygen in the d

Re: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-08-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 09:46:04 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 2016-08-06 23:37, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 05:00:09PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > >> as you somehow add jquery.js to your doc-package, please add its license > >> to your debian/copyri

Re: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-08-07 Thread Christian Kastner
On 2016-08-06 23:37, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 05:00:09PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: >> as you somehow add jquery.js to your doc-package, please add its license >> to your debian/copyright. > > The jquery.js is installed by doxygen in the documentation process.

How to specify files not in source package in d/copyright (Was: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2016-08-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 05:00:09PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > as you somehow add jquery.js to your doc-package, please add its license > to your debian/copyright. The jquery.js is installed by doxygen in the documentation process. It does not belong to the source package (the full au