"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:11 AM, Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Author, copyright holder, maintainer, tired of this, and all what not,
>
> Do you mind if I ask why you chose the QPL instead of a DFSG-free licence?
According to the FSF, the
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:11 AM, Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author, copyright holder, maintainer, tired of this, and all what not,
Do you mind if I ask why you chose the QPL instead of a DFSG-free licence?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 04:50:07PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 10/04/2008, Carlo Wood wrote:
> > It was added 16 March, that is 3+ weeks ago! :/
> > So, debian-devel@lists.debian.org: can someone tell me why
> > libcwd was added as amd64 package, but still doesn't exist
> > as x86 package pl
On 10/04/2008, Carlo Wood wrote:
> It was added 16 March, that is 3+ weeks ago! :/
> So, debian-devel@lists.debian.org: can someone tell me why
> libcwd was added as amd64 package, but still doesn't exist
> as x86 package please?
Because there are additional requirements for non-free packages to b
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:44:50 +0200
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was added 16 March, that is 3+ weeks ago! :/
> So, debian-devel@lists.debian.org: can someone tell me why
> libcwd was added as amd64 package, but still doesn't exist
> as x86 package please?
Because it is non-free?
--
It was added 16 March, that is 3+ weeks ago! :/
So, debian-devel@lists.debian.org: can someone tell me why
libcwd was added as amd64 package, but still doesn't exist
as x86 package please?
taryn:~>uname -a
Linux taryn 2.6.22-1-686 #1 SMP Sun Jul 29 14:37:42 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux
taryn:~>apt-cach
6 matches
Mail list logo
